Petition to Department of Education, Eduqas , Illuminate Publishing, WJEC , Ofqual
Change the way the Eduqas Religious Studies A-Level is assessed
This address is both on behalf of struggling students and unsupported teachers across the country, One-and-three-quarter years into studying the new Religious Studies GCE A-Level provided by Eduqas students and teachers are yet to receive - in most cases - nearly one half of the course material! This is utterly unacceptable considering students will be taking their exam in less than five months time. The year two Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism and Islam textbooks are still yet to be published one month into 2018. In terms of ethics and philosophy, the year 2 book is yet to be published. Thus, if an institution is studying Judaism and then the required philosphy and ethics side of the course then they are missing two of four books. We must also bear in mind that these unpublished books are the only hard copy materials approved by Eduqas for study. In turn, apart from the course specification, teachers have no reliable material to use to follow the specification and teach adequately to their students. From personal experience, my tutors have been attempting to piece together material to the best of their ability, making up the missing parts of the textbooks (still educated guessing!). However, students and teachers deserve adequate resources to meet the specification with guidance from reliable sources such as textbooks endorsed by the examining board. All schools, teacher and students, are in the dark concerning in some cases nearly half the course. In consolation, Eduqas has provided online material to help learners. However, this material is thin and doesn’t cover the whole specification - most of the material is taken from textbooks and adapted for online use and as discovered, we are waiting on many textbooks. Further, whilst there was an incredibly quick turnaround in terms of reshuffling the whole A-Level syllabus across all subjects, it is totally unsatisfactory that the minimal resources required to pass the A-Level are not in existance from the start or near start of the course. I therefore ask for acknowledgement of this unfair circumstance working against thousands of students and teachers across the UK and that the exam board has some kind of special circumstance recommendation in light of the poor performance of the publishing and Religious Studies team at their own institution.
Petition to Sir David Melville, Pearson, Edexcel, John fallon, The Rt Hon. Justine Greening MP
Reform the Critical Thinking A Level curriculum to continue the subject's teaching.
In a time of 'alternative facts', #FakeNews, and a so-called 'post-truth' era, the validity and reputation of news sources is crucial for constructive debate. Critical Thinking is a worthwhile A Level encouraging students to evaluate evidence we've been presented with, and encourages productive and critical discussion. Through Critical Thinking, one develops the ability to think clearly and rationally, understanding the logical connection between ideas. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information, which is a very valuable skill to hold. Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value, and can see varying perspectives on some of the most controversial and relevant topics of the day. From TED talks to debate motions, Critical Thinking gives an open and evolving curriculum that gives an insight into the world around us and the news, as it happens. OCR have classed Critical Thinking as unreformable, much to the dissatisfaction of students up and down the country (http://www.ocr.org.uk/qualifications/as-a-level-gce-critical-thinking-h052-h452/). We're calling on Pearson (Edexcel) to continue the subject, and work with subject leaders and lecturers who value the teaching of the subject as much as we, the students, value learning it. Our Further Education provision is greatly enhanced because of Critical Thinking. We believe the next students deserve the opportunity, too.
Petition to Mark Anderson, Dr Ian Stockford, Nicky Morgan MP
Ensure the representation of women on the A-Level Music syllabus
The current 2008 Edexcel A-Level Music syllabus has a total of 63 different set works from a variety of musical genres and eras. Yet not a single one of these set works was composed by a woman. I am a 17 year old A Level Music student currently studying the Edexcel syllabus. Earlier this year, I was part of an in-school gender equality and leadership programme for young women (Fearless Futures). Among other things, the programme looked into the way in which we are desensitised from noticing the lack of representation of women across different aspects of society. It was during this programme that I was shocked to realise I had never before noticed that there are no female composers included in my Music A-Level. So I decided to do something about it. I first thought this issue could be solved easily by contacting Edexcel directly and drawing their attention to their omission of women from the A-Level, as they advocate that students should "...engage in, and extend the appreciation of the diverse and dynamic heritage of music...”. I thought the lack of women was simply a mistake, an oversight, as clearly their aim cannot be fulfilled without the representation of women. However, a series of emails highlighted that Edexcel oppose any possibility of change to ultimately meet their own aims of creating a richer, more diverse musical world. While it is true that female composers aren’t as well known as their male counterparts (unsurprising as women composers are rarely studied in schools), the assertion by Edexcel's Head of Music that "there would be very few female composers that could be included [in the A-Level syllabus]" simply isn’t true. On 8th March 2015, BBC Radio 3 managed to do a whole day of programming of female composers to honour International Women’s Day. Surely, if BBC Radio 3 can play music composed by women for a whole day, Edexcel could select at least one to be a part of the syllabus alongside the likes of Holborne, Haydn and Howlin' Wolf? Edexcel’s proposed 2016 syllabus, currently awaiting approval from Ofqual, does not, once again, include even one female composer. This has got to change. How can we expect girls to aspire to be composers and musicians if they don't have the opportunity to learn of any role models? How can we accept that the UK's largest awarding body doesn't adequately acknowledge the work of female musicians? Why are we limiting diversity in a subject which thrives on its astounding breadth? Please sign this petition to urge Edexcel to take seriously their responsibility to create a more equal musical world through their educational material and include at least one female composer in their A Level syllabus.