Petition to New York's 4th Congressional District
Kathleen Rice: Send in your letter of resignation
U.S. Representative Kathleen Rice of New York's 4th Congressional District must immediately resign. If not by her own volition, then her constituents and superiors must demand her letter of resignation. Ms. Rice recently tweeted an appalling and disturbingly malicious comment directed at the NRA, its members and supporters and to Ms. Dana Loesch. Ms. Loesch is a conservative author, commentator and radio show host most widely known for her ardent support of the 2nd Amendment. Representative Rice, in a Twitter post accused Ms. Loesch and others of being domestic security threats. In her exact words: "I'm just going to say it. #NRA & @DLoesch are quickly becoming domestic security threats under President Trump. We can't ignore that" These comments are irresponsible of an elected official, bound by oath and duty to protect and uphold the Constitutional rights of their citizens. Does Ms. Rice honestly hold the millions of American gun owners with such contempt she finds them comparable to a domestic threat? Does Ms. Rice believe that the NRA, which constantly advocates for legal defensive gun use, is in essence a terrorist organization? Is Representative Rice aware of the definition and proper use of the phrase domestic security? Many residents of her own district are no doubt 2nd Amendment supporters and NRA members. Are they a potential security risk? This isn't about gun control or gun rights. This is about yet another elitist politician viewing their subjects with incredible disdain. I have absolutely no confidence in Representative Kathleen Rice to faithfully perform her duties with dignity and respect. She must be removed from her office.
Petition to Brian Boquist, Kate Brown, Oregon State House, Jeff Merkley, Pete DeFazio, Ron Wyden, Oregon State Senate
Stop Oregon S.B. 719
Senate Bill 719 is a direct infringement of a person's rights and must be stopped immediately. Please share this to everyone you know and help spread the word. As a law-abiding Second Amendment supporter in Oregon, I urge everyone to please oppose Senate Bill 719A. SB 719A would create a so-called "Extreme Risk Protection Order" (ERPO) that could be obtained by a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member in an ex parte hearing to deprive someone of their Second Amendment rights without due process of the law. By allowing a law enforcement officer, family member, or household member to seek the ERPO, SB 719A would allow people who are not mental health professionals, who may be mistaken, and who may only have minimal contact with the respondent to file a petition with the court and testify on the respondent's state of mind. This ex parte order, which strips the accused of their Second Amendment rights, would be issued by a judge based on the brief statement of the petitioner. The accused would not be afforded the chance to appear in court to defend themselves against the allegations when the ERPO is issued. These orders may be issued without any allegations of criminal behavior. Again, as a fellow law abiding citizen, I urge you to please oppose SB 719A. Thank you.
Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Thomas Massie, Rand Paul, U.S. Senate, President of the United States
Pass a Real 2nd Amendment Restoration Act
Proposed ~ A Bill: IN RECOGNITION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE 2nd AMENDMENT, AND IN UTILIZING THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND RECOGNIZING THAT CERTAIN LAWS ARE AN OBSTACLE TO THE ACCOMPLISHMENT AND EXECUTION OF THE FULL PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES OF CONGRESS, (1) All federal, state, regional, and local laws which in any way infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms, including, but not limited to, any laws which would require any (individually or in combination) marking, recordkeeping, serialization or registration of firearms or ammunition, are hereby deemed null and void by Congress, as they are an obstacle to the people's ability to exercise the 2nd Amendment right, and are an obstacle to the full purposes and objectives of Congress. (2) Any federal, state, regional, and local laws which would require any (individually or in combination) marking, recordkeeping, serialization or registration of any firearm parts, or of any objects which would later be made part of a firearm (whether or not the object would ultimately become a regulated part of a firearm), are also deemed to be null and void, as they are an obstacle to the people's ability to exercise the 2nd Amendment right, and are an obstacle to the full purposes and objectives of Congress. No further laws of the type in (1) and (2) shall be able to have any effect. CAVEATS, EXCEPTIONS: a) UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST (USML): Federal government may control by permit, and limit the use of, USML CATEGORY II, IV, V, VI, VIII, XIV, XV, and XVI items that are weapons, except for technical data or weapons and items routinely or commonly available in the civilian market. b) PROHIBITED PERSONS: It is unlawful for the following categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person: - convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, unless that crime was due to enforcement of a gun law of a State or a political subdivision of a state;- who is a fugitive from justice;- who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);- who has been adjudicated as a mental defective, due to the decision of a court, or has been committed to any mental institution, and due to the decision of a court, has been deemed unable to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition;- who is an illegal alien;- who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions, except that all such persons must have be given the right of appeal in a district court to address the issue of firearms and ammunition possession and use;- who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;- who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner Laws of a State or laws of a political subdivisions of a state that establish or attempt to expand upon these prohibited persons categories, shall have no force or effect. c) CAVEAT REGARDING EVIDENTIARY NEEDS OF POLICE, CUSTODY, AND IMPRISONMENT: Any persons who are taken into custody or who are about to be incarcerated can be relieved of arms by police, provided however that the affected individuals may petition the courts for relief and restoration of rights. This is not intended to limit the rights of persons bearing arms, concealed or otherwise, in circumstances where involvement in an incident would require that a person involved in a self-defense scenario (who had, following the incident, retreated to a safe location and notified a lawyer) notify police of the circumstances of what had transpired, but it would allow the police to request temporary custody of a weapon that was used in such an incident for evidence and documentation. IMPOSTS, DUTIES.Notwithstanding the preceding, any laws of a State or laws of political subdivisions of a State that impose a tax on conduct or possession of firearms or ammunition shall have no force or effect. Consistent with Article I, Section 10, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, no state shall "without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress."
Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Jason Chaffetz
A Grand Jury Review of Obama and Clinton for MURDER of SCOTUS Antonio Scalia
Obama meets with Scalia hours PRIOR to his death https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOE7he9lPTM&sns=em Hillary Clinton announcement of a replacement hours AFTER the death of Scalia http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article110149702.html Democratic Party's Link to the death of Supreme Court Justice Scalia EXAMINED July 2015 *H4A News Clips* *July 11, 2015* *TODAY’S KEY STORIES..................................................................................... campaign and a joint committee, a spokesman says, confirming Breitbart................................ 9 *HRC NATIONAL COVERAGE............................................................................. **9* Hillary Clinton makes Bob McDonnel look like a chump // WaPo // Jennifer Rubin – July 10, 2015 9 Hillary Clinton probably can’t get gun control passed. But she should talk about it, anyway. // WaPo // Paul Waldman – July 10, 2015................... Oct 27, 2015Clinton's seemingly failed attempt to 'recruit’ Comey to a path of impropriety. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45712#efmAAGABE Did FBI agent cave-in at some point and ultimately started ‘shielding’ both Obama and Hillary from questioning before election day? Had Comey become terrified at the release of the below Podesta email 11 days before before the Election? Was Loretta Lynch's direct order for Comey to “stand down” evidence of an attempt to calm such fears of Comey thus acting in concert with concealing a much larger agenda? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45712#efmAAGABE Will big Democratic Donor Poindexter and Doctor/Judge Cinderela turn Evidence on these 2 ‘implicated’ heavyweights Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton? Main agenda was obviously 'get rid of Scalia and the 2A' https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44131 Is not a United States Supreme Court Justice unexplained demise deserving of such an inquiry? Did Scalia Dine with Obama on that plane hours before His death then was cremated in haste sometime near Hillary Clinton's announcement of a SCOTUS replacement out of Texas all in a matter of 4hrs from the secret meeting between Obama and Scalia? Clear probable cause for review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOE7he9lPTM&sns=em Why was SCOTUS Scalia cremated in haste Thus presenting “a problem” Does this “problem” shed light on the Democratic Party? A huge Democratic Party contributor John Poindexter finds Scalia's dead body. Hillary & Obama obviously participated in the MURDER of SCOTUS Scalia upon information and belief. February 2016Below email makes reference not to Bernie Sanders, but to Scalia's “stand” on 2A. Following a successful ‘weekend at Bernie's’ (which was clearly the murdering of Scalia) his “belongings”, His Love of the Constitution particularly ‘2A, must be crushed out of existence or to a pulp’ as stated in the email. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44131 Yes..,only HOURS after the mysterious death of Scalia, Hillary Clinton was promoting HER CHOICE for replacement and in the precise vicinity where the 'unexplained' death of Supreme Court Justice, Scalia occurred. Hence, the term "wet works" makes perfect sense as alluded to! The question remains: Was Clinton the puppeteer or the puppet? During His final “Presser” was Mr. Obama overly concerned about exiting the Oval Office amidst “scandal”? What will a “special review unveil? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOE7he9lPTM&sns=em Why was SCOTUS Scalia cremated in haste WE THE PEOPLE request an immediate Grand Jury Review