Email Opposing the Industrialization of SCF Farm
  • Petitioning Christina Toy Lee

This petition will be delivered to:

Associate Zoning Administrator, Los Angeles City
Christina Toy Lee
LA CITY Planning
Fernando Tovar

Email Opposing the Industrialization of SCF Farm

    1. TakeBack TheFarm
    2. Petition by

      TakeBack TheFarm

      Los Angeles, CA

Here is the sample letter you can send to christina.toy-lee@lacity.org

Christina Toy Lee
Associate Zoning Administrator

200 N. Main St. 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Via email: christina.toy-lee@lacity.org

Re: Comments on the Case No. AA-2012-919-PMLA/Construction of Four Industrial Buildings

Dear Ms. Lee,

I am writing to voice our concern over the proposed construction of four industrial buildings at the site of the displaced South Central Farmers urban farm in reference to Case No. AA-2012-919-PMLA as noted above.

The Project contemplates the construction of a approximately 565,796 square feet of industrial buildings on the 10.04 acres of vacant land that was historically used as a community garden for residents of south central Los Angeles. These residents, mostly racial and ethnic minorities, suffer from a scarcity of open space and other environmental amenities that most middle-class Angelenos take for granted.

The destruction by bulldozers of the world-acclaimed South Central Farm and eviction of the farmers in July of 2006 marks the most controversial episode in the entire history of urban planning and land use decision-making in the Los Angeles-area. The decision to proceed with the destruction of the farm met with widespread, indeed global, condemnation of an act that displaced a rare and precious cultural and agroecological site of singular importance to the non-governmental and governmental agencies concerned with the future of our local food systems and more sustainable forms of urban inhabitation and land use.

It is our reasoned and expert opinion that the CEQA requires the City of Los Angeles to analyze all projects that have the potential to cause significant environmental impacts and to mitigate all significant impacts to the maximum extent feasible. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) may be adopted when “the initial study [“IS”] has identified potentially significant effects on the environment” that “would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur…” (Pub. Res. Code § 21064.5). The minimal impact threshold has not been met and the current IS and MND fails to adequately identify the full range of significant impacts emanating from the Industrial Project and further fails to mitigate those impacts to below significance. The MND is improper and also violates the spirit and intent of the federal and California Principles of Environmental Justice since this is a community that already faces disparate adverse impacts from industrial facilities, hazardous sites, and a lack of public open space.

A CEQA review document “must include detail sufficient to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to understand and to consider meaningfully the issues raised by the proposed project.” Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405. The Project’s MND fails to specify what the project actually is, which is a fatal flaw under CEQA. An “accurate, stable, and finite project description is the sine qua non of an informative and legally sufficient” environmental review document. San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. County of Merced (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 645, 655, quoting County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 193. Accordingly, the MND fails at this most basic level as an adequate informational disclosure document.

 

To:
Christina Toy Lee, Associate Zoning Administrator, Los Angeles City
Fernando Tovar, LA CITY Planning
Email to the City Planning Commision Opposing the 4 Warehouses on the Site

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Recent signatures

    News

    1. We have hit over 100 signatures. Let's show them we can do more.

      TakeBack TheFarm
      Petition Organizer

      Please let people know about the petition and forward it to as many people as you can...

    2. Reached 100 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Aki Son-Katada LOS ANGELES, CA
      • 10 months ago

      I believe the history and current activities of SC farmers deserve much more support and special attention from the city. The farmers' achievement and healthy food culture they created are an essential part of our community, especially the low-income immigrant community of Los Angeles.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Michelle Huang IRVINE, CA
      • 10 months ago

      My family used to get CSA from this farm. I would hate to see this farm go!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Nina Zvaleko LOS ANGELES, CA
      • 10 months ago

      Green Space, Local food, Community Cooperation. South Central Farm had it all. we have enough industry, storage, grey, in this areas, let it grow again and serve the community. If will save lives in the long run.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Stanley Tran ENCINO, CA
      • 10 months ago

      The right thing to do!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • william yllanes CHINO HILLS, CA
      • 10 months ago

      Because Los Angeles is the homeless capital of the world. I am a full time student and was homeless for 6 months. It was at the farm that I developed a sense of self worth and confidence.

      Agriculture is a part of all of our cultures. No matter where we come from agriculture is a part of our history. If we choose to forget our history and dismiss our past we in turn dismiss our future progress.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.