Veterans Fighting State Courts!

0 have signed. Let’s get to 5,000!


State Courts Declare Open-Season on Veterans’ Disability Compensation!

Please allow me to take you on a brief journey. Try to imagine yourself as one of the many wounded military personnel (Man, or Woman) currently recovering from their combat injuries at Walter Reed or Brook Army Medical Center. Let’s pretend that you are a survivor of an RPG attack that has left you disfigured and disabled. Let’s say you have spent months in the hospital recuperating and in physical therapy. You have been awarded one of this nation’s highest awards for your service and sacrifice, the Purple Heart Medal. Your doctors tell you that you will be in some pain and on medications for the rest of your life, and that your disfiguring scars will fade a little with time…

Your body has become immune to your pain medications, and you are forced to just ‘deal with it’. Sleep is the only relief you have. When you can finally fall asleep, your body jerks violently waking you back up. Every time you close your eyes it is as if you were reliving/replaying the entire RPG explosion in your dreams over and over again. Your subconscious mind tries to convince yourself that ‘this time’ you will somehow jump out of the way of the rocket and not be hurt. But, when you are startled awake, the pain and discomfort reveals the ugly reality. On one hand you are extremely grateful to be alive, and on the other hand, you question your survival. You don’t yet understand that your wounds are both physical and emotional and that the physical and mental scars from your near-death experience are very deep and will follow you throughout your life until the day you die.

Now, allow me to elaborate even further. Let’s say your injuries qualify you for service-connected disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and you receive a tax-exempt monthly disability check from the VA. And let’s say, in spite of your scars and disabilities, you are fortunate enough to find a mate and marry. Now, imagine your marriage decaying over several years to the point of divorce because your spouse no longer wishes to live with your jumping in your sleep. You are totally disabled and unable to work, and your only source of livelihood is your VA disability check. You provide the divorce court with a sworn financial statement that substantiates that your VA check is your only cash source and you have no other assets. The next thing you know, a civil court judge has awarded half of your VA disability compensation to your able-body non-military ex-spouse in the form of alimony, or spousal support. Your attorney advises you that there is nothing you can do about it, and withdraws from your case. You can’t afford to retain another lawyer, so you are faced with four basic decisions;
(1). Just shut up and pay the court order, or go to jail and then pay the order anyway.
(2). Find a pro-bono attorney to file an Appeal and fight for your earned veteran’s disability compensation.
(3). Leave the state and never return.
(4). Blow your brains out.
Sound far fetched? Not at all, in fact similar scenarios unfold in divorce courts nationwide everyday. Self-serving attorneys and judges have found ways to circumvent federal laws that prohibit third party awards of veteran’s benefits. The VA and our politicians turn a blind eye towards these civil courts as they wrongly interpret veteran’s disability compensation as a divisible marital asset. Many veterans are already paying support payments directly from there Veterans disability through apportionments, but state courts still choose to double dip into the disable veterans disability, forcing the Veteran to pay twice after the Department of veterans affairs has already made a ruling in the matter through the apportionment process. A ruling which is made to make sure the disable Veteran doesn't indure unjust hardship. The Department of veteran affairs apportionment process! ( supreme court justices scalia ruling!)
State Courts Do not have jurisdiction in the matter of support payments. if the department of veterans affairs has already made an appointment ruling!
(The part of Rose Vs Rose state Courts want reveal in support hearings)
Had the Administrator granted or denied an application to apportion benefits, state-court action providing a contrary disposition would arguably conflict with the language of 211 making his decisions "final and conclusive" - and if so would in my view be pre-empted, regardless of the Court's perception that it does not conflict with the "purposes" of 211. But there is absolutely no need to pronounce upon that issue here. Because the Administrator can make an apportionment only upon receipt of a claim, Veterans' Administration Manual M21-1, ch. 26, § 26.01 (Aug. 1, 1979), and because no claim for apportionment of the benefits at issue here has ever been filed, the Administrator has made no "decision" to which finality and conclusiveness can attach. See Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 367 -368 (1974) ( 211 does not bar claim that a statute regarding benefits is unconstitutional because Administrator has made no decision as to that issue). The Court again expresses views on a significant issue that is not presented. Many veterans are becoming homeless, deprived of descent medical care, some can't even afford a whole months worth of food. state Courts along with the Department of social services have made it there duty to deprive veterans of aid, shelter and descent living conditions, in order to keep receiving more and more government subsidies from the Federal government.
They bypass all constitutional protection. The disable Veteran has no right to an attorney, the disable Veteran has no right to a trial by jury, the disable Veteran seventh amendment rights are revoked. Multiple Constitutional protections are subverted so they can hold the disable Veteran in contempt. Which is a method of coercion to leave the disable Veteran there into the disable Veteran can tap into every resources they have to pay the purge and to pay for freedom. Studies shows that state Courts have become The leading cause of homelessness among disable veterans because of there state Courts ruling taking away disable Veterans disability. There is an inherited conflict among Judges and lawyers, due to the state receiving federal subsidise from the Federal government in exchange for child support payments.



Today: VeteransFighting is counting on you

VeteransFighting StateCourts needs your help with “Veterans fighting State Courts Group!: Veterans Fighting State Courts!”. Join VeteransFighting and 2,886 supporters today.