Revealing of details of report of harassment case against cji.

Revealing of details of report of harassment case against cji.

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
At 100 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!
Sparsh Saini started this petition to SUPREME COURT

I dont know how the procedures work but i do believe there is something wrong in the hearings and proceedings of the harassment case against cji. With due respect to supreme court,  i as a citizen of india who truly believes in fairness of Supreme court , wants that supreme court should prove that it is that supreme institution where power and status cannot influence even the last bit of justice. Thus we all should sign this petition so that we can get to know about the details of the reports ,enquiry , hearings either formal or informal , proofs , witnesses and about everything which is considered by the bench in giving their judgment.

Many prominent lawyers and former chief justice of delhi high court has raised their concerns. 

  • Justice A P Shah, former CJ ,Delhi HC

Former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Justice A P Shah has commented that he was "extremely disturbed by how this enquiry has been held" and added that the process has ended in a "complete mockery of justice".

"I am extremely disturbed by how this inquiry has been held. Initially it seemed as though the Supreme Court was looking to remedy the situation brought about by the extraordinary hearing. Ideally the probe should have been conducted by an external committee, but to compensate, the court added two women judges into the committee. But even so, in no sense can this be called an inquiry. And what followed did not help much either", he said in an interview to Indian Express.


"All that the woman asked for was to be represented by a lawyer or a friend. This was a very basic, and in my view, a reasonable request, coming from someone pitted against three powerful judges of a powerful institution. But this basic minimum right was denied to the woman. What Justice (D Y) Chandrachud now appears to have said in his letter is absolutely correct, when he wrote that the woman should be allowed to be represented by a lawyer or an amicus curiae. I also agree that there ought to have been an external inquiry. There is no other way to ensure that the judiciary can be viewed as an impartial body

  • Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate

"The inquiry in this case, which has now concluded, did not meet the open and fair standard", said Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate, in an article written in The Hindu

  • Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave has termed the procedure a "miscarriage of justice" in an article written in The Hindu

We are not making mockery of our supreme court .......we completely believe in them but this time we sense some some loopholes so we demand Supreme court should not hesitate in revealing the details it's their duty to be fair and make us clear about this case.

I hope we all sign this petition and in some way we get to know about the ways this case was handled by our supreme court

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
At 100 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!