On September 17th, The Saskatchewan Roughriders Football Club has mandated you to provide proof that you have been fully vaccinated – that is, have received two doses of an approved COVID-19 vaccine and surpassed the two-week waiting period after your second shot, to enter and attend a home game.

Adults who are unvaccinated for medical or religious reasons, or partially vaccinated, will be able to show a negative COVID-19 test taken a maximum of 48 hours before the game.

This is a blatant violation of Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; violation of Section 12(1) of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, 2018; violation of  Article 6, sections 1 and 3 of The Nuremberg Code, 1947.  It's a violation of The Health Information Protection Act (HIPA) in that I do NOT CONSENT to the disclosure of my PERSONAL MEDICAL INFORMATION! Therefore you cannot ask for it.

The Nuremberg Code makes FORCED vaccination illegal – along with all other forced medical procedures (including testing) and therapies. The Nuremberg Code doesn’t single out vaccinations or any other procedure or therapy – it outlaws all forced procedures and therapies.

Discrimination by exclusion of entrance with forced vaccination or testing by duress and coercion, is criminal.

Bodily integrity is the inviolability of the physical body and emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy, self-ownership, and self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. In the field of human rights, violation of the bodily integrity of another is regarded as an unethical infringement, intrusive, and criminal. 

The Saskatchewan Roughriders and the people of Saskatchewan need to take a hard long look at the ramifications of this type of division in the masses. I for one, will not be forced to take a medical therapy, that I legally do not have to and because I consciously believe and object to it.

Section 64 of the Public Health Act, 1994 

Conscientious objection to immunization
64(1) A person who conscientiously believes that immunization or prophylaxis
would be prejudicial to his or her health or to the health of his or her child or ward,
or who for conscientious reasons objects to immunization or prophylaxis, may
swear or affirm an affidavit to that effect before a justice of the peace, commissioner
for oaths or notary public.
(2) A person described in subsection (1) is excused from compliance with any
regulation, bylaw or order pursuant to this Act that makes immunization
mandatory if the person delivers personally or by registered mail to the local
authority for the area in which the person resides a duly attested affidavit
described in that subsection.
1994, c.P-37.1, s.64; 2003, c.29, s.70.