BismillahiRahmaniRaheem,

Tortured. Shot. Falsely imprisoned.

At the hands of America.

This is a demand for innocent Aafia Siddiqui to be returned to her home country.

PLEASE SPREAD.

If YOU or I had been kidnapped and detained without charge or trial in Bagram (and tortured physically psychologically and sexually) for 5 years as well as our child, then released only to be rearrested with your young son, then shot in the abdomen (by US soldiers) almost dying, then flown across the world only weeks later (while still recovering) then framed to have been the one trying to shoot the soldiers. Then sentenced to 86 years in a prison known as the house of horrors. With no terrorism charge.  What reaction would we expect from the world?

Be the reaction. Demand her return.

Note: During the kidnapping in Pakistan, eyewitnesses claim that her son and daughter were taken by the kidnapers. Her 6 month old baby (Suleiman) fell to the floor and is feared dead. 

Claiming to have strong principles is far from putting that into action. Have words really become that cheap. 

The case against Aafia was based on claims that after being subjected to torture in Bagram, being released and then re arrested, in a frail and possibly drugged state, one of the trained us servicemen had suddenly forgotten all of his training and left his gun on the ground - which she somehow managed to pick up and use to shoot at the soldiers wrestling them to the ground. No gunshot residue on her clothes or hands. Conflicting accounts of the ordeal. No fresh bullet holes. A written statement from the Afghan police commander present that she never touched the weapon.

Be the reaction. Demand her return.

In reality she was sat behind a curtain and when she heard the voices of Americans she was afraid of going back to bagram and being tortured again. She looked past the curtain for an escape route before a us soldier saw her shouted "she is free!" and shot her multiple times.

The trial of Aafia Siddiqi was a clear demonstration of the oppression in the American courts. The jury was exposed to propaganda being spread by the media naming her as "lady Al Qaeda" for which they had no evidence. The first judge acsribed to her case claimed that the case was illegal as it involved rendition of a Pakistani to America.