Say no to the non-farm use application on ALR land on Schafer road.

0 have signed. Let’s get to 500!

Firstly please understand my concerns have nothing to do with the product I am actually 100% in favor of de-criminalization of marihuana not legalization.

But, I do have concerns for the Green Amber project being planned at the Schafer road location as this project is being constructed on ALR land and ALR land is, and should remain, a valued public concern. The ALR was established by the British Columbia government in 1973. It was intended to permanently protect valuable agricultural land that has among the most fertile soil in the country from being lost. Despite having been in existence for over 40 years, however, the ALR continues to be threatened by urbanization and the land development industry. This land was preserved not only for this generation to grow and produce food but for future generations to do the same as well. I believe the Amber green project falls outside of the spirit of the ALR project as this company is a pharmaceutical company producing a legislated medicinal drug in an industrial complex and not a farmer producing food on a farm.

The True Leaf company, which has been operating in Vernon for years has also purchased land for their new operation. This company however, with their respect for the people of Lumby and the land around it have purchased their land in the industrial area of Lumby and have planned and constructed their facility with openness, honesty and within the rules and regulations set out by the district. I applaud them for their ethical veracity.

Please realize that all further information has been taken from what I can find on the internet (there is very little about this company) and may not be 100% so please feel free to correct me when I’m done.

Green Amber has come to Lumby with the promise of jobs and economic benefits but make no mistake their intent is profit. As such they have assembled a group of five directors from Toronto Ontario, each having a specific background with intended purpose. That board of directors is made up of a real estate Lawyer (someone who can fight their legal battles), One (maybe two) ex Ontario government department of agriculture employees (people who know what it takes to get through the application process), a horticulturist for the Ontario government and an engineer who was last president of a company that designed and installed airport lighting and control systems. I believe this group has chosen our province solely to take advantage of the ALR loophole and procure cheap land and labour. Why else would a group of people from Toronto Ontario (where land is expensive) locate a multi million-dollar project so far away from home? Why not purchase land in Lumby or Vernon or any other town or city with an industrial area? The answer is, because that land would cost them 5 to 10 times what they paid for the ALR land.

From what answers I have gathered this company intends to build a 100,000 sqft complex. Four 20,000 sqft steel and tin buildings with HVAC and power generation etc for growing and another for offices and administration as well as concrete parking lots and shipping receiving areas. The ALC has regulated that marihuana operations must not pour concrete over the valuable land that they build on but grow on that land. This company is already contesting that and is applying for a non-farm use permit on ALR land so they can pour 100,000 sqft of concrete for floors in the buildings. How will 100,000 square feet of concrete poured over this soil ensure that land is usable for future generations to farm? How will any farmer be able to use this land in the future? With five steel and tin industrial type buildings smack in the middle of it who would be able to use this land for farming without tearing it all down at a giant cost?

Amber Green is a private company and as such is privately funded, which brings the question “is this project fully funded to start-up?”. Will they be able to finish all construction or is there a possibility that this land could be partially developed and then moth-balled? Leaving an eyesore on the shore of the beautiful Shuswap river and in our neighborhood. Also there is currently much uncertainty in this new industry, other public company shares are falling, the government is still not 100% on their legislation and will review it again in four years or a new government may change it up all-together. There is a huge possibility that this company could fail and again leave an unusable eyesore in our beautiful neighborhood a situation similar to the Lavington glass factory.

All this being said we also must consider the new traffic that will be going through our area. 30 employees will travel to and from the site daily. They must have garbage pick up, septic removal, supply deliveries, deliveries from other producers for processing, product transport, site visitors for inspections etc. All of this traffic will be new to the area. We must consider the noise from daily operations and power generation when the power goes out, as it does every so often in our area. Industrial lighting at night to secure the facility will bleed though to the surrounding properties disturbing the current residents. Three million litres of water a year will be removed from our water table, has a study even been completed to ensure that there is adequate water for all in the area or is it just assumed? I know my well has been low before as I’m sure many others have as well.

In conclusion.

Two years ago a gentleman knocked on my door and introduced himself as the new owner of the property next to mine. He stated that he was going to log the land, sub-divide it into two pieces and set them up for sale as small horse ranches or farms. We were sad to see the forest go but did not mind the idea of this type of operation at all. The reality is that the largest part of the land will be industrialized, taken out of the intended purpose of the ALR and eventually be left an eyesore. Neighbors selling a property on one side have already lost two offers on their property and the agent has advised them to lower their price $100,000. The reason being their front view looks out directly over this property. This project is not only negatively impacts the ALR and the environment but it will change the current pattern of development and existing character of the area. Our regional growth strategy should support the town of Lumby as the primary growth area for the community due to its existing community infrastructure, services and economic and employment opportunities.

Here is the link for the RDNO directors contact information if you would like to phone or email them directly.

Today: Steven is counting on you

Steven St. Amand needs your help with “Regional District of North Okanagan: Say no to non-farm use of the ALR in Lumby”. Join Steven and 393 supporters today.