Name of our Nation to be changed from India to Bharat. It should have been done in 1947

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!


The name India was given by Britishers, now we are Independent, the name should again be India to Bharat. They converted Bharat to India to prove their dominance. They enslaved us by changing the name. We feel proud to be Bharatia. They changed names of several cities, they are being changed back to original, than why not to change the name of our Nation back to Bharat.

Example of cities, Chennai - Madras

Mumbai - Bombay

Kolkata - Calcutta

Gurugram - Gurgaon

There are many

Once the names of cities can be changed to original, I request Government of India and President of India to change the name of our Nation back to Bharat

----------------------------------------------

THE HINDU

Bharat vs India: one nation, two names
V. P. Dhananjayan

How many countries have two names, one constitutionally documented and another probably an English translation for people who cannot pronounce it?

People speaking English or any other European language often have a problem pronouncing eastern names. So in the past they would change names according to their convenience, and we blindly accept those.

Look at us: we operate with two names, the original name Bharat, and the given name, India. The invaders of Bharat who came up to the river Sindhu somehow managed to pronounce Sindhu as Hindu, and then Indus. And finally India is stuck on us for centuries now.

Historians should give a satisfactory explanation for the evolution of this name ‘India’, or trace its origin. I could not find anywhere in the Vedas, Puranas, Itihaasa or even Amarakosa the word or name ‘India.’

The scriptures say “jambu dweepe Bhaarata varshe….” And from time immemorial a meaningful Samskrita ‘padham’ Bhaarat, has been in vogue: no one can deny this. Yet, our Constitution included the name India and liberally allowed everyone to use it even after attaining Independence from foreign invaders.

 
When we speak in our regional languages or Rashtra bhasha, we proudly use the name Bharat or Bharata Matha. But while addressing the nation in English, people refer to it as India, like a translation for the original name for non-Bhaaratiyas to understand.

Sri Lanka eschewed the name Ceylon long ago. But we cling to the name left behind by the invaders. Should we really need two names? Can we not stick to the name Bharat and let others understand that we are switching back to the original name Bharat?

I don’t know whether I am right or wrong, some writers say that after Independence Mahatma Gandhi wanted to dissolve the Indian National Congress and form a party with an indigenous name. Probably for fear of an identity crisis, the then leaders did not pay much attention to Gandhiji’s advice and continued to fight the elections in the same name of Indian National Congress.

By then, splinter groups from the Congress called themselves the Janata Party, Bharatiya Janata Party and so on. Now if we change to Bharat, this may be advantageous to the BJP. The nation needs a debate on this issue.

bkalanjali@gmail.com

 



Today: Jangsher Singh is counting on you

Jangsher Singh Gill needs your help with “Petition to Narender Modi Prim Minister of India: Name of our Nation to be changed from India to Bharat. It should have been done in 1947”. Join Jangsher Singh and 30 supporters today.