STOP HR620! HANDS OFF MY ADA! WE ALL KNOW SOMEONE! WHO DO YOU KNOW?

0 have signed. Let’s get to 7,500!


 The Honorable Paul Ryan
Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Capitol H-232
Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
House Minority Leader
The Capitol H-204
Washington, DC 20515

Re: Opposition to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Education and Reform Act of 2017 (H.R. 620)

Dear Speaker Ryan and Minority Leader Pelosi: 

OPPOSE the bill and STOP THE VOTE on H.R. 620 today!

 This will weaken and destroy the Civil Rights of millions of people with disabilities! DO BETTER!

As a Mother of young disabled person of America who has come to be a part of the community reliant on the ADA, an advocate for disability rights, an ally to disability rights and/or a social justice/equity advocates I sign this petition opposing the ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017!  

 I must take a stand. H.R. 620 is not complying with our civil rights. We all know someone, who do you know? Today is my son, my neighbor, a friend, or simply it can very well be you!

H.R. 620 would create significant obstacles for people with disabilities to enforce their rights under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to access public accommodations and would impede their ability to engage in daily activities and participate in the mainstream of society. Rather, the burden of protecting the right to access a public place is shifted to the person with the disability, who first has to be denied access; then must determine that violations of the law have occurred; then must provide the business with specific notice of which provisions of the law were violated and when; and finally, the aggrieved person with the disability must afford the business a lengthy period to correct the problem.
The bill’s proponents purport to protect business owners from the burden of understanding and complying with rules designed to ensure that people with disabilities could access public accommodations, claiming this burden is too heavy for businesses. Yet people with disabilities are expected to shoulder this burden and to provide businesses with information about the specific legal obligations that they are violating—after those individuals have been denied the access rights that Congress gave them decades ago. We know of no other law that outlaw’s discrimination but permits entities to discriminate with impunity until victims experience that discrimination and educate the entities perpetrating it about their obligations not to discriminate. Such a regime is absurd and would make people with disabilities second-class citizens.

Almost 28 years ago, the ADA was carefully crafted as a bipartisan compromise to take the needs of covered entities, including the types of businesses covered by Title III, into account. Among the compromises reflected in the ADA was the absence of any damage remedy in Title III; only injunctive relief and attorney’s fees are available for violations of this part of the law. The fact that, almost 28 years after enactment, there are still organizations, businesses, and companies who violate the law and deny access to people with disabilities suggests that businesses should be better educated about their legal obligations under the ADA—just as they are expected to be about the other legal obligations that they undertake in running a business—not that we should limit the rights of people with disabilities to participate in their communities.

Section 2 of this bill states that the bill was written in consultation with … and representatives of the disability rights community. But H.R. 620 was not written in consultation with representatives of the disability rights community and it would create barriers to the civil rights for persons with disabilities that do not exist in other civil rights laws.

As was mentioned earlier, the ADA has been law for almost 28 years. By this time, business owners have had ample notice of the ADA’s requirements and opportunity to remove barriers. If, after 28 years, a business has continued to not comply with the requirements of this legislation, why should a person have to wait more time for enforcement of their civil rights? Should an individual who is not allowed to enter a restaurant because of their race, gender or religion have to wait before seeking to enforce their civil rights? Title III of the ADA already reflects a compromise that takes into account the concerns of businesses; it does not allow individuals to seek damages for violations of their civil rights. Now legislation like H.R. 620 seeks to further erode the civil rights of people with disabilities.

OPPOSE the bill and STOP THE VOTE on H.R. 620! 

Please, sign the petition to fight against the creation of this bill!! This is incredibly important to all of us protected under the ADA. This is how we remain equal. Doing this would hinder our equality greatly.

#HANDSOFFMYADA #STOPHR620

 



Today: Grace is counting on you

Grace Loeb needs your help with “Nancy Pelosi: STOP HR620! HANDS OFF MY ADA! WE ALL KNOW SOMEONE! WHO DO YOU KNOW?”. Join Grace and 5,747 supporters today.