Support London ON Transit Plans
0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
Upshift London’s Transit
There has been a backlash of anti-transit from a group regarding London’s attempt to implement rapid transit. This view seems to be very short-sighted and counter to the growth and development of London. Rapid Transit is a well-established way to promote growth of a city in a sustainable way. The introduction leads to new investment along transit corridors and helps foster local communities.
London’s current transit network is outdated and unable to provide adequate service to residents, resulting in low usage and underperforming financial burden. The Shift plan allows us to reset this process and establish a starting point for better transit services for everyone in the city. Taking the bus is anything but efficient; it is no surprise that many Londoners rely on their cars. The routes are winding and often times the bus is late or early to the stops. The proposed Rapid Transit can help deliver consistent timings and help simplify bus routes by providing a backbone through the city.
As residents and business owners in this city, medium term pain during construction can reap benefits far into the future. Continuing expansion of the city through road widening and annexation of land around the city is not a sustainable option. These new developments lead to additional costs for road and utility maintenance and property taxes will be increased to meet these requirements. In addition, multiple studies across North America have shown that road widening only increases congestion due to the supply and demand model of traffic flow. (Duranton, 2011) On the converse rapid transit allows for population intensification, and redevelopment of existing neighbourhoods all while providing a source of income to offset maintenance costs. (Carrigan, 2013) Rapid transit, if implemented properly will also provide a viable means of transportation thereby reducing the number of cars on the road. (Duranton, 2011)
Opponents, such as downshift, seek to delay the progress of rapid transit in hopes that it will be abandoned. This is evident in their goal of seeking to stop the project rather than discuss options to make the rapid transit plan viable from all perspectives. The city is amenable to modifying implementation to suit the needs of London, yet downshift has yet to provide any useful feedback as to how to assuage their complaints. This reminds me of the opposition to the construction of Budweiser Gardens, which has since become an economic cornerstone in our downtown.
Councilor Phil Squire, based of his comments to the London Free Press, seems to be quite outspoken in opposition to the rapid transit project. (Maloney, 2016) This strikes me as odd based on the fact that he is the councilor for the surrounding area of Western University and many students are reliant on public transit to get around the city. He seems to be doing a great disservice to a large portion of his constituents. Western and Fanshawe are huge economic drivers to this city and it is important that their students have input on this issue that impacts them greatly.
I urge anyone who supports the future of London’s public transit to sign my petition to reinforce the notion that public transit is something that Londoners want contrary to the opinions of a small but vocal minority.
TL:DR Rapid transit will be a benefit to London, please sign petition if you support its development.
Carrigan, A. (2013). Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit. World Resource Institute.
Duranton, G. (2011). The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities. American Econmic Review, 2616-52.
Maloney, P. (2016, March 7). London city hall: The tunnel for the city’s $560-million rapid transit proposal is being questioned by a politician steering a committee overseeing the project. London Free Press.
Today: Brent is counting on you
Brent Biro needs your help with “Mayor Matt Brown: Support London ON Transit Plans”. Join Brent and 41 supporters today.