Article III Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour (emphasis added), and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. In only two circumstances is a judge not immune from liability: (1) for nonjudicial actions; and (2) for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in complete absence of all jurisdiction.  Id. at 11-12; Schucker, 846 F. 2d at 1204. Prosecutorial Immunity applies to the decision to prosecute a particular case; “This immunity covers the knowing use of false testimony at trial, the suppression of exculpatory evidence, and malicious prosecution.” Milstein v. Cooley, 257 F. 3d 1004, 1008-09 (9th Cir. 2001).  An act done in complete absence of all jurisdiction cannot be a judicial act. Piper v. Pearson, id., 2 Gray 120. “It is no more than the act of a private citizen, pretending to have judicial power which does not exist at all. In such circumstances, to grant absolute judicial immunity is contrary to the public policy expectation that there shall be a Rule of Law.” Application of immunity to judges who admitted under oath to engaging in a criminal scheme that lasted for years would indeed be "monstrous." [Quoting Judge Learned Hand in Gregorie v. Biddle, 177 F.2d 579 (2d Cir. 1949)] To find immunity would denigrate the respect of the public for the judiciary, which is dependent upon judges making decisions based on the law and the facts, rather than personal, corrupt motives. Whereby; the Tenth Amendment states:  The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.  We The People, hereby ask Congress to create a subcommittee to investigate and address the flagrant abuses of Judicial Immunity and Bad Behavior rampantly exerted by the Judicial Branch under the Color of Law.