Vote No on Idaho's Tiered Certification Proposal
Idaho has proposed a Tiered Licensure rule that potentially ties a teacher’s license to student test scores and local evaluations. To bribe teachers to accept this bad idea, an ‘increased’ teacher salary would also be tied to these evaluations. Tiered licensure is bad for kids, taxpayers, and teachers.
Please sign this petition to oppose the proposed rule, and reject poor policy that will negatively impact our children, students, schools, and taxpayers.
BAD FOR KIDS
-More pressure to perform on high stakes tests
-More test prep
-Less differentiated instruction
-More time testing
-More test anxiety
-Fewer electives (and recess) in favor of more drill on tested topics
-Lower performing students will have less access to highly qualified teachers
-High poverty schools will have less access to highly qualified teachers
-Kids’ needs lose priority over pleasing administrators
BAD FOR TAXPAYERS
-$250 million initial price tag
-Reason to believe costs will increase
-Other states with tiered licensure are fighting lawsuits brought by teachers who unfairly lost their license
-More administrators will be needed in each school to be able to perform added evaluations
-More district personnel will be needed to compile and keep data for each certified employee
-More red tape and bureaucracy
-Less local control
BAD FOR TEACHERS
-There is not one tool that can measure student growth fairly for all teachers
-Initially math and language arts teachers will be judged at a time when curriculum has changed drastically. Will growth be a measure of a teacher's’ effectiveness or will it actually measurethe effectiveness of this new curriculum?
-How will student growth be measured for the librarian? school nurse? math coach? reading coach?
-Special education teachers will be judged based on the population of students who, by definition, will not meet growth goals.
-The evaluation tool the state plans to use was never designed to be an evaluation tool
-The author of the evaluation tool has stated that “basic” means satisfactory, but the state wants to take a teacher’s license if they receive “basic” scores
-Teachers lose the security of the current salary schedule
-Experience is not valued in this scheme
-Additional education is not valued in this scheme
-Teachers who have spent their own money and a lot of time to continue their
education will find that it is meaningless to their license and salary
We know bad policy when we see it. We want to keep control local, as it should be. Please join us in rejecting this proposal.
For more information please visit IdahosPromise.Org
Dear Voting Stakeholders regarding the Tiered Certification Proposal,
We resolutely believe that tying a teacher's certification, compensation, and evaluation to a tiered certification model is deeply inappropriate.
We believe that teacher licensure and teacher evaluation are two distinctly separate processes that should not be conflated together.
We believe in local control, and are opposed to power being centralized at the state level under this proposal.
We believe that linking a student's standardized test score (SBAC / ISAT 2.0 / IRI) to a teacher's certification, compensation, and evaluation is an inappropriate method of evaluating a teacher's performance, particularly for teachers working with special populations of students such as Special Education, English Language Learners, and Alternative/Academy school students.
We sincerely implore you to Vote No on Tiered Certification Proposal.
Idaho's Promise started this petition with a single signature, and now has 1,624 supporters. Start a petition today to change something you care about.
Today: Levi is counting on you
Levi Cavener needs your help with “Idaho State House: Vote No on Idaho's Tiered Certification Proposal”. Join Levi and 1,623 supporters today.