Dissatisfaction with Legal Philosophy results (LJU4801) - Low Marks & 0% Marks/No Mark!

Dissatisfaction with Legal Philosophy results (LJU4801) - Low Marks & 0% Marks/No Mark!
Why this petition matters
Dear Lectures and Dean of the College of Law,
Please find the our grievances outlined below by unisa students re the module LJU4801:
- Many/majority of students who received lower marks and some received zeros for the module (while some did not receive any yet got a fail)
- We demand that every student be granted the opportunity to have their scripts remarked.
- Alternatively be granted a supplementary exam should they not satisfy the requirements to pass the module.
- for students who received zero and those with blank results yet failed be furnished with reasons should they query their results.
We believe all students who took part in this exam should be given a fair assessment grading, a majority of students who participated in the exam should be marked fairly and if they have failed the module should at-least be granted a supplementary exam entry as many students will be in their last semester and repeating this module will further delay them due to this academic year being their last year where their bursary (NSFAS) will continue to fund them, all we ask with this petition is a fair chance for everyone who wrote this exam to have their script remarked, and/or granted a supplementary exam since we are not granted a fair chance to appeal our results through the usage of the system created by UNISA for every UNISA student to apply for such (remarking or qualify for a supplementary exam).
We believe winning this will not only benefit us, but every UNISA student now and in future, and with that being said, it should create an opportunity for unisa to review their policies regarding such modules, every student deserves to the opportunity to query their result, including the ones who were awarded a zero mark in their exam.
take note: this petition is not here to promote or support any plagiarism whatsoever committed by students, but to advocate for a fair system that recognises every student and gives them an opportunity to voice out their thoughts/feelings.