Stop the corruption in our courts!!
0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
***ALL FOUR OF THE VIDEOS IN THIS CASE WERE TURNED OFF BY OFFICER'S OR THE VIDEOS HAVE BEEN EDITED.. THESE ARE THE ACTUAL IN FULL VIDEOS PROVIDED TO THE COURT*** Please examine the federal courts order for what is the truth in America!!
I am in need of Help, my situation involves jim crow laws still being used against poor blacks in the United States, the obvious attempts against my life on multiple occasions by multiple State and Federal employees.
Boone County Case No: 15-209 & 15-209-3
Leagle.com STATE v. AUSLER (April 27, 2017)
United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division. No. 3:17-CR-30003.
pacermonitor.com Western District of Missouri Southern Division 6:17-cv-03004 Ausler v. Stubblefield
pacermonitor.com Western District of Arkansas 3:17-cv-03036 Ausler v. Bradford
pacermonitor.com Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 0:17-cv-02487..
There is a conspiracy on my life and I have provided exhibits, being recordings, public record documents and these officers dash cam videos.. All claims ar factual and on the State and Federal records, being ignored and covered up by the courts at which i have been notified by the ACLU, that none of my public records are accessible...
Please assist me in fighting for my life against this corrupt justice system..
IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO ALLEGE OR SHOW THAT OUR RIGHTS ARE ILLEGALLY AND CORRUPTLY VIOLATED?!?
Leagle.comSTATE v. AUSLER 3:17-CR-30003. STATE OF ARKANSAS, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO AUSLER,
Defendant.United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division.April 27, 2017.Attorney(s) appearing for the CaseState of Arkansas, Plaintiff, represented by Wes Bradford, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney.
OPINION AND ORDERP.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District
Taken as true, the facts alleged in the notice of removal and which can be inferred in Ausler's favor from the remaining attached documents do not demonstrate that Ausler has been denied or cannot enforce in the State courts of Arkansas any federal rights provided under any law providing for equal civil rights.
It is not enough to support removal under § 1443(1) to allege or show that the defendant's federal equal civil rights have been illegally and corruptly denied by state administrative officials in advance of trial, that the charges against the defendant are false, or that the defendant is unable to obtain a fair trial in a particular state court. The motives of the officers bringing the charges may be corrupt, but that does not show that the state trial court will find the defendant guilty if he is innocent, or that in any other manner the defendant will be `denied or cannot enforce in the courts' of the State any right under a federal law providing for equal civil rights. The civil rights removal statute does not require and does not permit the judges of the federal courts to put their brethren of the state judiciary on trial. Under § 1443. Assuming Ausler's federal equal civil rights have been or are being denied him in the Circuit Court of Boone County, he makes no allegation or showing that the appellate courts of Arkansas would similarly deny him his rights.
Today: Antonio is counting on you
Antonio Ausler needs your help with “Department of Justice: Stop the corruption in our courts!!”. Join Antonio and 29 supporters today.