Petition Closed

Devon's Burgh Island's beauty in danger!

This petition had 4,683 supporters


The former owner of Burgh Island has hit back at the decision to grant planning permission to a ‘pool house’ on the island.

Last month, SHDC granted permission for the building that straddles the headland and a rock stack, the design of which was the culmination of an architectural competition, narrowly given approval with a vote of four against three, with three abstentions.

Present at the meeting, Tony Porter, who sold the Island to Deborah Clark and Tony Orchard in 2001, said he was "flabbergasted". Mr Porter has provided images showing what he describes as “pictorial evidence of how the ugly building perched on the ancient rocks of the Mermaid Pool would appear to visitors either from the top of Folly Hill, from the popular South West Coast Path or, even closer, the popular beach itself"

He continued: “When we bought the deserted  island, our policy was always to restore not to change. Already the new owners have added hundreds of solar panels, and now this.

“I’m afraid the beauty of the island is being slowly defaced. I still have such a love for the place, where we spent 16 years of our lives. I hate to see it being disfigured in this way.”

He added: “The application originally described the building as a ‘stand-alone suite’ for the hotel, but, over the last three months, it has for some reason, changed to be called a ‘pool house’.

“I think it’s a highly dangerous project too, far from the hotel, with a perilous drop on both sides of the pathway leading to it. There is still time to prevent this thing from scarring the island, and I have strong support from the head of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty to complain about last month’s decision. I will welcome multiple contact from all those lovers of Burgh Island, all over the country, who can join me in my efforts.”

Former Bigbury Parish councillor, Peter Cook spoke at the South Hams District Council Development Management Committee meeting where permission was granted.

Mr Cook said that he knew “almost every local resident” and that nobody he knew is “in favour of this development”.

Mr Cook called the building a “concrete carbuncle” and said the “brutal design” was “inappropriate” in a “prominent position”, and would ruin the Mermaid Pool above which the buil\ding is proposing to sit.

Mr Cook focused on the visibility of the building from Folly Hill approaching Bigbury-on-Sea and from the South West Coast Path at Clematon Hill, noting that none of the photos in the application took into account the downwards view from the coast paths.

He also said the application is “contrary to policy CS1 of the South Hams Core Strategy and DP2 of the South Hams Development Policy”.

Policy CS1 states: “It is important to protect, conserve and enhance the character features of the landscape... the undeveloped coastal zone.”

While Policy CS9 states: “The quality, character, diversity and local distinctiveness of the natural and historic environment will be conserved and enhanced”. 

The AONB themselves recommended refusal of the application on the grounds that it could “harm the landscape”.  Roger English, manager of the South Devon AONB said: “We’re clearly disappointed that the DMC went against the advice given by the AONB Unit"

“The AONB is not in a position to make a legal challenge to this decision, but Mr Porter is at liberty to use our objections as part of a legal challenge, if that’s the action he wishes to take.

“Although the application site lies outside of the South Devon AONB boundary, Burgh Island makes an established and extensive contribution to the setting of the South Devon AONB. National policy together with our planning guidance is clear that the requirement during decision-taking to apply ‘great weight’ to conserving landscape and scenic beauty applies regardless of whether a development is located within the AONB or its setting. The key consideration is whether the AONB will be affected by the proposal. In our view the AONB would be affected and in a negative way.

“While the owners of the island assert it is a hamlet, it is clearly a mainly undeveloped island with a prominent hotel and a number of clustered ancillary buildings.”

“Our view is that the island as a whole and the specific location for the hotel suite proposal is undeveloped coast. There are strong landscape, heritage coast, undeveloped coast and AONB grounds to have refused development in this sensitive and unsustainable location.”

Lovers of this beautiful green island who visit from far and wide are horrified at this proposal, and amazed that the application was ever approved. Word has it that construction will be delayed for a few weeks, so please sign this petition quickly and ask your friends to do it too. THERE IS STILL TIME !!

Today: tony is counting on you

tony porter needs your help with “Chairman South Hams District Council Planning: Vote to save the beauty of Burgh Island.Stop this monstrosity NOW”. Join tony and 4,682 supporters today.