Us, Bernie & A Constitutional Recall Survey

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!

"It's simple and easy. Do we have an honest government or not?" - Grand Canyon, AZ

Hey! Let's talk about Constitutional Due Process and the 2016 Primary Election.

The Issues:

  1. Domestic Election interferences usurped our votes & denied us our rights to have a Secure, Fair & Impartial Primary Election.
  2. Bernie Sanders WON the Primary.

 Question 1. Premise:

Did We receive Constitutional "Due Process" (5th & 14th Amendments) and "Equal Protection of the Laws" under the Equal Protection Clause?

                . . . . prohibits the federal and state governments from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."  i.e. The right to participate in the political process, such as the rights of voting, minorities, association, free speech & freedom from discrimination.

         Example: Exclusive contract vs Open bidding

  • DNC, Superdelegates, uncounted votes, voter suppression, purged votes, electronic voting machine errors, lack of ballots, turning voters away, etc. verses the American voters' rights for choice. 

        Example: Discrimination

  • "Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist,” “AMEN.”

         a) Yes       b) No       c) the evidence is compelling

 Question 2.  Evidence:

Do you believe 2016 Primary Election interferences can be proved on (Criminal) "reasonable doubt" or on (Civil) "preponderance of the evidence" or by "clear and convincing evidence"?

a) Yes - Criminal   b) Yes - Civil   b) No  c) evidence is compelling for both

 Question 3.  Information/Education:

Do you believe we were properly educated and informed with accurate, fair, trustworthy & representative coverage during the 2016 Primary Election cycle?

     a) Yes     b) No     c) Coverage inconsistent

 Question 4.  Priority

Should Domestic anti-Bernie Primary Election meddling receive as much priority & attention as "alleged" Russian pro-Trump General Election meddling?

  a) Yes.     b) No.     c) More-so     d) Unacceptable at any level

 Question 5.  Reparations:

What do you consider to be an equitable action for resolution? examples:

  • A "true" and "attested" accounting of ALL (non-Superdelegate) votes & election obstruction interferences, beginning with  February 1, 2016 Iowa Caucus through June 14, 2016 D.C. Primary.
  • A New PAPER BALLOT ONLY Re-vote, without Superdelegate interferences.
  • A "Sanders v Trump" November 6, 2018 Presidential Recall Election.
  • Legitimacy in Our Elections, Fundamental Rights & Leadership.
  • No further action needed.
  • What's the point? We're powerless.
  • A Class-Action Lawsuit.

Bonus Round:

Were you aware of a Petition sent to the FBI, DOJ & NSA prior to the January 20, 2017 Inauguration requesting primary & general election rights protections?

     a. Yes     b. No     c. I should have been made aware

 On Further Consideration:

Is there a case for "Obstruction of Justice"?

Post. Share. Tweet. Email. Chat. (Updates to be provided.)


"It's our elected officials & appointees job to serve & protect us. Shouldn't we have their full attention in ensuring a legitimate leadership?" - Nashua, NH

"We will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. So help us God." 5 U.S. Code § 3331 -> Oath required of all employees of the U.S. Government as a requisite of employment.


Contact info:


Director Christopher Wray (202) 324-3000

Executive Office - (202) 324-6014

FBI Switchboard: 800-225-5324

FBI Headquarters - Election Fraud
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

FBI Field Offices:


Main Switchboard: 202-514-2000

AG Jeff Sessions -

Acting Asst. AG John M. Gore - Civil & Voting Rights
DOJ Civil, Voting Rights, Election Fraud (202) 514-4609

DOJ Voting Section:

Voting Section phone: (202) 307-2767

Voting Section email:

DOJ Contact Form:…/w…/your-message-department-justice

National Security:

Inspector General: (301) 688-6327


Oversight Committee (202) 225-5074

Congress: (202) 224-3121




Election Fraud Worksheet -

Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses:


Statutes and Crimes on Voting Interferences, but not limited to:

a) 18 U.S.C. § 595: Interference in election by employees of federal, state, or territorial governments;

b) § 2302(b) of Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.): give an unauthorized preference or advantage to anyone so as to improve or injure the employment prospects of any particular employee or applicant;

c) § 2302(b) of Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.): deceive or willfully obstruct anyone from competing for employment;

d) 18 U.S.C. § 241; § 2422: Voter Suppression;

e) Voting Rights Act of 1965: Civil Rights Crimes

f) "Most election fraud aims at ensuring that important elected positions are occupied by “friendly” candidates." - Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses

g) Patronage Crimes: Patronage crimes are most prevalent when one political faction or party dominates the political landscape but is also required to defend its position of power against a credible opposition;

h) 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law; (a) Promise or deprivation of federal employment or other benefit for political activity: 18 U.S.C. § 600 and § 601.

i) Civil Rights Crimes - Discrimination based on a potential voter’s race, or on ethnic factors or minority language, may also be redressed under such criminal statutes as 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242. These prosecutions are handled by Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division.

j) 2 U.S.C. § 441d; Campaign Dirty Tricks (a) Election communications and solicitations.

k) 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiracy to defraud the United States; to the extent that the evidence shows a conspiracy to defraud the public of the fair and impartial administration of a federal grant or program;

l) 18 U.S.C. § 241: Conspiracy Against Rights.- Section 241 does not require that the conspiracy be successful, United States v. Bradberry, 517 F.2d 498 (7th Cir. 1975), nor need there be proof of an overt act.


n) United States Constitution - the 5th,14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th Amendments – “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged .  .”
Thank you