Release Washington Man charged with ACI

Release Washington Man charged with ACI

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
At 100 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!

CIAO started this petition to Attorney General for Washington State and

A man in Washington state has been convicted of  having consensual sex with  someone the State of Washington says he may not have sex with.If the man had been living in  New Jersey or Rhode Island, or in any one of  38 other countries, he would not  be in the trouble he is now in.He has not  broken a universal law, just a state law. https://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/news/lawyers-argue-over-incest-at-sentencing/

Washington state law contravenes Universal Law as per the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Release the man and reform the law. The law in Washington is wrong and bad and here is why. 

There are no laws to stop married or unmarried adult woman having sex with manipulating convicted serial murderers, serial rapists, serial pedophiles, felons, pedophile and raping priests or white collar criminals, such as people with psychiatric illnesses and personality disorders, people who might be sexual perverts, sexual and or economic predators like bank-sters and politicians and pathological narcissists.

There are no laws to stop adult women or men having unprotected sex with or marrying a person with Herpes, syphilis , gonorrhea, thrush, HIV AIDS, Hep A, B, or D or D, or any of a large variety of other diseases that can cause birth defects in children , or with people with limbs amputated or missing organs, or with brain injuries,or with genetic diseases causing low IQ, mental retardation, mental disorders or a host of other birth defects.

There are no laws to stop a women or men adults sleeping with someone who is or has been taking gene-damaging drugs, such as alcohol and cigarettes. and other drugs for recreational or medical use that are toxic to the body, carcinogenic, or mutagenic , or teratogenic and or iatrogenic.
A woman or man is free to marry or have sex with a monster if he or she chooses, unless the monster is a close relative!

Adult woman in Australia (where prostitution is mostly not a crime) can have sex with every adult in her street town and country, and every other adult in the world, with several people a day if she likes, several people at one time, if she likes, every day of the year if she likes, no matter what colour or race or religion and the law says nothing, (and is in most cases legally entitled to charge money!) unless those adults are close relatives of hers. Even if those close relatives of hers may have no criminal records, no illnesses physical or mental, no physical or mental defects and no genetic diseases, and they they both use contraceptives, or are both past the age of menopause,or both have been sterilized and both use contraceptives, they are guilty of incest even if she has sex even only once with them and no child is born. Even if a child is both perfectly healthy, they are still guilty.
So the woman or man is allowed to produce children with birth defects with other people as long as they are not close relatives and the state will is happy to pick up the tab for the cost of caring for any children she has born with birth defects who she has produced with these special people who are non-close relatives such as the ones listed above.
But if she has sex with one of those nasty close relatives, and they do it with her, she and that close relative will be charged with the horrible crime of incest and she and her horrible close relative (who could possibly be the same person who paid her to go through primary secondary, school and university , or the one who gave her a deposit for her house, or donated his or her rare type of blood for transfusion when she got injured, or an organ match when they had a rare phenotype) will be jailed fined and placed on a sex offenders list even if they were careful to use contraceptives and had not produced a child with birth defects. And if she did have a child with the horrible close relative, they will be taken from her and put into state care and or adopted out to complete strangers, until the state no longer pays for such care. The the teenager will be dumped on the street to become a criminal.

The law thus arbitrarily and unreasonably makes a distinction between types of relationships and unfairly and unconstitutionally discriminates between those who are related up to a certain arbitrarily defined point and those who are not.The demarcation lines of family relatedness are arbitrarily determined across states and countries, and in some places the incest law has been extended to include people who have no blood relationship at all, but includes people who are only in a position of authority over someone. That is also arbitrarily determined law that changes according the the place and time and authorities involved. It is bad law. "The range of human rights that everyone should receive is outlined in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. There are 30 Articles in the Declaration that highlight the basic rights of all people.
The Declaration includes the rights to:

not be discriminated against
be treated equally before the law
be presumed innocent until proven guilty
have one’s privacy respected
move to, and live, where one wants to within their country
visit another country
marry and have a family
own property
work and have free choice of employment
be paid reasonably for work done
have an education
a standard of living adequate for the health and well being of oneself and one’s family (with food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services)
security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond one’s control
participate in the cultural life of the community.


Jailing two adults who were engaging in a victim-less crime of adult consensual incest (ACI) ( no one is injured by their mutual love and affection) is not just discriminatory but it is a mockery of justice, and a waste of the justice department's and the tax payers' time and money. The victims of such a travesty of justice ( ACI-Oriented or 'CIAO' couple) have their time and money wasted also. The time they are kept in custody, is time that they could have remained employed and paying off their mortgages and caring for their children. A conviction will spoil their chance of finding work, and their chance of finding a place to rent or travel to. They might end up unemployable and dependent on government benefits simply because one person did not like their relationship and complained to the police. Now the whole society has to suffer the cost of keeping them in jail, the cost their rehabilitation, the cost of social benefits and the cost of maintaining their children. They may have additional health care costs after all this stress of discrimination and persecution. This present legal system thus discriminates against CIAO people, but it not only punishes them and but it punishes society at the same time. The system seems to have an 'auto-immune disease', an over-reaction and mis-direction of the body politic's immune system that causes it to attack good parts of its own society, not just the bad. In this way it is creating disrespect for the law, as ordinary everyday people can see that the law is sometimes inappropriate, anachronistic, irrational and bigoted , a throw back to the time when we burned witches, homosexuals and heretics. Modern countries like Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, People's Republic of China, Estonia, France,Georgia, India, Israel, Italy ( if no scandal is caused) Ivory Coast, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kirghiz Republic, North Korea, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands ,New Jersey (US) Pakistan, Portugal, Rhode Island ((US), Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Tajikistan, Thailand,Turkey,Turkmenistan Ukraine,Uzbekistan don't have such laws against adult consensual incest. Only one of this list of countries has a law against homosexuality.


The only possible reason to maintain laws against ACi is eugenics. However, since no proper studies have been done that prove beyond a doubt that ACI produces more birth defects per head of population than non-ACI, and since eugenics was long ago discredited by its use by the Nazi regime as a valid reason for anything other than war against certain targeted classes and races of people, the laws against ACI can can only be seen as a violation of the human rights of CIAO people and an insult to the integrity and humanity of the people and governments on planet Earth.
Protecting CIAO (Consensual Incestuous Adult Oriented) people from violence and discrimination does not require the creation of a new set of CIAO-specific rights, nor does it require the establishment of new international human rights standards. The legal obligations of States to safeguard the human rights of CIAO people are well established in international human rights law on the basis of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequently agreed international human rights treaties. All people, irrespective of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity, are entitled to enjoy the protections provided for by international human rights law, including in respect of rights to life, security of person and privacy, the right to be free from torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, the right to be free from discrimination and the right to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.

The core legal obligations of States with respect to protecting the human rights of CIAO people include obligations to:

Protect individuals from incestophobic violence.
Prevent torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.
Repeal laws criminalizing adult consensual consanguineous-sexuality and consanguineous (CIAO) people.
Prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Safeguard freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly for all CIAO people

 

 

 

 

0 have signed. Let’s get to 100!
At 100 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations!