Give MPs a vote on Britain's Single Market membership

0 have signed. Let’s get to 200!


Membership of the Single Market was never up for discussion during the EU Referendum, and therefore should not be part of the vote to leave the EU; a separate body! 

In light of the electorate’s decision to leave the European Union, and the Government’s stance on our membership of the Single Market, I have created a petition calling on the incumbent Government to hold a seperate parliamentary vote on Britain’s membership of the Euro Economic Agreement (Single Market). This will give our elected representatives the opportunity to decide whether it is in our best interests- separately to Article 50-for businesses and the economy to ultimately withdraw. 

This is an issue of constitutional significance and the government will be, if it does not put the subject to Parliament, in breach of constitutional practices that will subvert the very apex of our democratic system- parliamentary democracy. 

You see, Article 127 of the 1994 EEA Agreement states Each Contracting Party may withdraw from its Agreement provided it gives at least twelve months' notice in writing to the other Contracting Parties. Indeed, it states: "Immediately after the notification of the intended withdrawal, the other Contracting Parties shall convene a diplomatic conference in order to envisage the necessary modifications to bring to the Agreement".

However, because the UK is a separate 'contracting party' to this agreement, leaving the European Union does not automatically result in a cessation of EEA membership. Indeed, as British European Economic Area membership is enshrined into UK law through the 1993 EEA Agreement Act, then, due to parliamentary sovereignty, triggering Article 127 requires the vote of our legislature before it can be formally triggered.

In spite of this, the government have acted inconsistently, and appear ambivalent to approach the subject face on. Originally, after challenging the Government through the Divisional Court on the topic of Article 127, the (Single Market Justice) SMJ campaign reported that the Government accepted that Article 126 does not “give rise to the termination of the EEA Agreement ipso jure”.

Yet, surprisingly, the Department for Exiting the European Union seemed to somewhat u-turn, stating that the EEA Agreement will “no longer be relevant for the UK“, “it will have no practical effect” and therefore “we do not envisage a vote”. What is clear here is that the government clearly are not giving this urgent matter the attention it deserves. 

With or without Article 50, the UK is a member of the EEA in its own right. All UK citizens have rights to live, work and trade in the Single Market. Those rights surely don't evaporate because we are leaving the EU. Even by transporting this legislation into the EC Act 1972, does not entirely remedy the issue. Whilst Parliament will ultimately have a vote on the Repeal Bill (which will include Single Market membership) to enact Brexit; this, constitutionally, should not annul the legal basis of EEA Agreement for as has been mentioned, it is a completely separate entity falling outside the jurisdiction of EU membership. Article 127 of the EEA Agreement must be triggered separately with twelve months notice given to other contracting parties; not bypassed by fusing the legislation to form the Repeal Bill.



Today: Oliver is counting on you

Oliver Murphy needs your help with “A vote to leave the EU is not a vote to leave the Single Market”. Join Oliver and 156 supporters today.