www.bentcop.biz E-petitions

12,670 supporters

To get the UK road signage put lawfully correct, and refund drivers who have been victims of legal abuse, by getting refunds of fines and penalty points and disqualifications removed from driving licences. While at the same time Bringing the authorities and people who are responsible to Justice for crimes against drivers. Perverting the Course of justice, legal abuse, fraud by giving false accounts, fraud by failure to reveal information when there is a legal duty and obligation to do so, giving false account of a driving offence (10 points) and causing drivers to contravene traffic regulation orders both physically and by fraud of Law. (false accounts of case information) and by failure to check, maintain & provide the appropriate road signage whether or not it was there lawfull duty. Not to forget the government attempting to change laws to escape liability. (the Mp's can be prosecuted for anything which is not declared as parliamentary work, which they have outlines in their own conduct and behaviour policy and crime policys on fraud.

Started 3 petitions

Petitioning CPS Gerry Wareham, Barbara Petchley & Andrew Penhale CPS West Yorkshire

Refund of the Ossett bypass A638 fines and removal of Penalty points and Convictions.

VideoUpdates* Discussion directly to Andrew Jones MP https://youtu.be/mL7cYB5AbMY New video discussion after telephone conversation with Truvelo UK https://youtu.be/s7SBeFqZ3XI     Campaign Video If you need any more info than ive added here on Change.org please visit Petition Evidence and investigation forum and Campaign website and other petition links for all ATTACHED EVIDENCE AND INVESTIGATIONS. The youtube channel is here bentcop.biz youtube channelBut most videos are placed in context in the forums at bentcop.boards.net Introduction: The Ossett bypass speed limit has not been lawfully enforceable since at least the year 2000, when it was changed from a National Speed Limit dual carriageway (70mph) to a 50mph speed limit in the year 2000. Apparently, with consultation and signatures between Police Chief Colin Ralph Cramphorn and Wakefield Council by the creation of the 50mph traffic regulation order (TRO). Which I obtained a copy of to find out this information. For the TRO order to have legal effect, thus for the speed limit to even be required to be "observed" by drivers in LAW, The road signage must comply and conform to prescriptive government safety and signage requirements that are clearly published in the TSRGD and Traffic signs manuals. Traffic Signs Regulations and General directions. The Evidence that the police gather "on-site" with their various Home office approved LTI ultralyte and radar devices, is only obtainable by law on condition that the roads signage has been regulary checked and cleaned and kept in prescriptive compliance with the TSRGD and Traffic signs manuals. If this signage which comprises of configurations and sizes is not correct and not in maintained conditions.. Then, the Police evidence is not submissibe to take into a court to prosecute Drivers with. This is Government rules and policy. It means that, If the Authorities do not Go out of their way to first make every effort that the Road signage and safety requirements are legally met. Then the Driver by Law does not have to go out of their way to Adhere to and stricktly comply with the speed limits. Thus spending any time and money on enforcement on the road WITHOUT first ensuring the signage, safety features and road markings are not lawfull and correct.. is a complete waste of police time.(Unless the police & Highways agencies & council like to use this as an advantage to catch more speeding drivers by NOT providing adequate guidance and safey at REGULARLY attended strategic enforcement sites) Worse than this... The particular road has had a Wakefield "Europort" planned purposely designed sign in place entering the 50MPH area, when the sign subconsciously resembles a National speed limit sign (70mph). And the TSRGD specifically prohibits any signs that look too much like other signs and could be misleading. Its a known psychological contributor to driver responce. In fact the whole Department of Transports system is built on subconscius signals and directions.Thus Wakefield Council Europort planning teams have a Link to the Police Chief and the Local Council and even the government, in the placement of this illegal sign, for the Wakefield europort, which is an obstruction itself and misleading. I cover this part of the set-up on the website in the Ossett bypass discussion. I have investigated other appearances of the sign and its usage and my opinion is that sign was a unique creation for the Ossett bypass, with a few scattered instances other locations to make it appear legitimate.In the year 2002 the TSRGD was published in a cream cover edition. In it no 300mm size National speed limit signs were prescribed. As they are too small for purpose. Yet the country was already riddled with them. They became in law from then on "an obstruction to driving" and should have been removed. Just as any other unlawfull sign or lack of sign, or incorrect configuration of sign should be corrected. Which is an obstruction to driving. The signs were left in place and very poorly placed. Including all kinds of missing or over used instances all over the country. That is another legal national case in itself. See the Wakefield Councils own website which confirms my understanding of the LAW is correct. Wakefield Council legal evidence of signs status And the BBC 5 live podcast link BBC 5 live podcast legal legislation confirmation Which confirms my legislative understanding is correct. Two terminal signs (one either side of the road) have been a legal requirement to give legal effect to a change in the speed limit, and its enforment. At least Upto 2016, when Andrew Jones has attempted to change the rules. Repeater signs have also been a legal requirement as well to give legal effect to the speed limit. And safely remind drivers of the speed limit. This is confirmed in the TSRGD 2016 circular. (Even though the book does not seem to be a book of sign placement and configurations. Only of sign design specifications for creating and making the signs). Thus Andew Jones in my Opinion as well as Patrick McLoughin are crooks, and conmen, like their predesessors. And like to dilly dally with the Police's role in the enterprise of traffic enforcement which has been crooked from the start, and cap-stoned with such tricks as outside lanes which lead up TOLL plazas of different motorways. As well as the M62 junction 13, which was a joke build to create traffic jams. With a bridge obstructing a sign and sliproad slowing down traffic where shevrons should have been. Seemingly the Government like to "Build in" jokes into the framework of society with intent for it NOT to run smoothly.. as if its a sort of a James Bond villain film Gag Comedy. *(when its serious safety compromise is not a joking matter.) a jest at the misfortunes in life, but done on purpose. They also facilitate people to exceed the speed limit by supplying cars that cause and give permission to exceed 70mph which is the highest speed limit. Thus they have caused speeding to be possible. In fact they have financed the countryon the ability of cars to exceed the top speed limit. Where otherwise the accident rate would have been half. And many people would never have died. Road safety would have been important, but never as BIG ISSUE to use as a bargaining tool, for money making cameras and a weapon to use to gain support from mothers and families who had lost loved ones in accidents. On revenge missions, against the wrong people. While Lords sip Gin and Rum and Spirits from expensive vintage bottles and expensive cigars. In the year 2008 the Traffic Signs Manual chapter 3 was published by the British Government. In it, there was no sign information for 50mph dual carriageways published. Only for "lit and unlit" National speed limit dual carriageways. Also for a normal 50mph road, the repeater signs size was made to be 450mm minimum size. Like with the National speed limit signs. Because 300mm was obviously deemed too small for dual carriageway purposes and usefull visibility. The West Yorkshire police force with Wakefield council did NOT update the 300mm 50mph sign sizes in 2000, Or erect a 2nd required terminal sign for the speed limit at the entrance to the road. & they did not change the signs to correct configurations. Even though there was no real change in accident statistics on the road. The story of how the signage exactly ended up how it is.. is a Mystery story. It sems that 300mm National speed limit repeater signs changed to 50mph 300mm repeater signs, then there was some other update (possibly after a court case) but illegal signs were not removed. It is a Columbo, Sherlock Holmes, Hercule poirot case of a criminal plot against the British Driver, that the Police, Government and Council want to pretend does not exist. Yet it is the Biggest elephant in back seat of 450 Million UK Driving Licence holders cars & lorrys. Who are footing the Bill of the Depertment of Transports "Big kids play set" building projects and "Dream job" careers.. as if Pat McLoughlin was a Rod Stewart with a real live train set in his attick. Yet instead, it is a play set of the Entire UK road systems. And he hasnt been planning it to run smoothly. No.. only to generate "COIN" to build more playset. As a perfectly smooth running playset would be far too boring. At Detriment to his pawns (us) & not to forget the National newtwork of Lawyers and solicitors who make thousands of pounds a time our of defence cases. Claiming it is "Specialist" Law & worth higher fees, when its more simpleton than family Law, or Criminal law. Most of these solicitors do not have intent for road signs to be correct nation wide, as there will be no defence points to argue in court. Although many dont even use them.. resorting to different tactics like bribery, begging and blagging excuses. Professional Solicitors like Freeman & Co in Machester do not even turn up in court. But send inexperienced female barristers who have no working knowledge of the specialist field, or the case. And CPS lawyers are there only to win competition orientated victorys, not see the roads are fit and proper. The system had become guilty until proved innocent, and free from the new automatic guilt process, which the police refuse to correspond over correctly. And lock themselves in secure building so as not to be questioned or interviewed in person over road signs & prosecutions. The Ossett bypass road had mysteriously aquired a local nickname as "The Mad Mile" which was circulated and spread to young male drivers. Supposedly to represent its use as a "short racetrack" for night time and weekend speed encouragement by the police... Who had by that time built several "non regulation" (do not exist in any manual) parking platforms to deploy mobile police vans on, containing speed measuring devices. (radar and laser speed guns) mostly LTI ultralyte ranger and concept devices provided by tele-traffic UK, which are notoriously innacurate and can be used to "Get MPH" off cars shapes, just as Skateboarders and BMX bikes "Get Air" out of ramps and features that are similarly shaped. Thus "Speed camera-ing" was also a sharp-shooter hobby for the police. The owner of Tele-traffic UK Mr frank Garratt is an ex police colleague who is not an independent witness and cannot give evidence in court any longer. By 2000-2016, the road was already supplying a wealthy flow of motorists, of multiple nationalitys - who innocently assumed the road was National speed limit, after they exited from the M1 motorway junction joined to the road. A perfect money-spinner for a "Pop-up toll road". Which has absolutely negligible change in accidents. And even the statistics themselves are highly questionable. Just like many of the fixed speed camera statistics. Which showed strange history of use if you requested the data by F.O.I. request. Where blank data was there where there should obviously be convictions. A sign that a lot of deleting had been going on, to hide the true number of prosecutions from the public. The addition of the local folk-lore hearsay "advertisement" of the road as a young boys racetrack called "the Mad Mile" only encouraged boys to go there at night time and race. ( the police and council may have created this name themselves for added effect) .. This Was touch and go with the local police patrol, who likes to play with small boys in their fast sports cars. A typical Tory-type hearsay political style stunt. Like the word "Brexit". The real Problem was the "Granted permission" and "authorization" by HM Government Lords and Ministers.. To even allow the sale of vehicles that "caused and permitted" young boys to even drive cars capable of exceeding the speed limit, In cars that were not safe. Because the insurance was far too high for vehicles that were a lot safer, if involved in an impact. And those expensive cars handled better at higher speeds. Such as 40mph in 30mph areas. Or 30mph in 20mph areas. With brakes that performed significantly differently. But the young drivers were not allowed to access these safer cars because of higher insurace premiums. The ultimare recepie for disaster and multiple crashes and fatalities by a retarded police and Government system. Many crashes caused by overtaking in unstable, slow cars could have been avoided at speeds around 50mph and 70mph could have been the maximum speed. The "MAD MILE" was the perfect road to obtain a very high number of motorists driving between 50 to 70mph at any time on any day. Any day of the week. Either buisness men, visitors, young boys or locals. It was a River of money... that started rolling when the Police felt like fishing. And it had been set up purposely to be deceptive of its speed limit to the unsuspecting driver. This is the Honour and Shame Blow the Police do not want to accept. That they are NOT the Knights of the People, Protectors of the Public. But the Pawns of the Government and only after Coin and Promotion and Good Hunting. Truly This is the Sherrif of Nottinghams Men, Enforcing the Toll Road. The Troll under the Bridge. The Theives in the Forest. And the Police have Choosen the Role, and Played it Perfectly. To their Vocation, Leisure & Pleasure. Unfortunately the only thing that WAS "mad" about the road.. Was the signifant "effort and money" spent on putting police ON the road and KEEPING IT UNSAFE AND ILLEGAL! the work and effort of 16 years of regular active enforcement of this "narrow band of speed" (between 50 and 70mph) that the police knew people would drive in. Bets on. And in fact was the RIGHT & CORRECT SPEED FOR THE ROADS DESIGN... While the signage and road markings..were left unlawfull, illegal and not enforceable for the entire 16 years upto 2016.. even When repeated complaints got nowhere. Until i did get at least some of the signs changed recently. Although there could have been past court cases concerning the road, but we need the names to find the case study and then only the Crown court cases are accessible on record. The new Labour party "fast track" process system avoided any change of police investigating the road signs. And mobile speed camera & fixed speed camera technicians were not adequately trained. And were protected by the police, to carry out what was directed of them, without question, even in the face of hard unquestionable evidence, manuals and law. While the polices own manuals were primary school standard in detail and description. So as less information was given to help the police bend the rules and frequently break them. The dumbing down of pawns. In a National gambling racketeer ring. But still many, many safety features are missing, incorrect and incomplete as well on the Ossett bypass. Even the destination sign appears never to have been in place! Approaching a slip exit. Bollards, reflectors and Sharp deviation of route boards. Not uniformly in place. And a host of unsafe police platforms all non regulation & unfit for the Dual Carriageway. Where other police forces would have opted for the Bridge position. Such as Wrexham bypass & Chirk bypass, North Wales and West Mercia police. I have some other petitions on this matter.. And a full website story. Including photos and videos which i will add soon to this petition. This Change.org petition is supposed to send emails to all decision making authorities as people sign. (and there are a large number of authorities who can make the decision. Yet none will comply, not even to hard evidence, LAW and legislation.The Police and Courts are a Law unto themselves. Inconsistent speed limits when its a legal requirement for the Government to provide consistent speed limits. The major disadvantage that the drivers have been subjected to... In addition to lack of signage, a different speed limit to what they would expect from contemporary roads with the same profile.. (consistent speed limits) Is not in fact a lack of knowledge of road signs. Or even the surprise entrapment of carefully, calculated police enforcement rotas. But the fact that the legal sector, lawyers, solicitors.. The council and police chiefs all "knew" about the unlawfull sign configurations. And the dangerous disadvantage and inadequate information it conveyed to drivers visiting the area. And in fact obstructed any resolution to the legal mess that the road was creating. (or was created FOR. by purpose of premeditated intent) To "Get drivers" on. With speed guns. While... In total.. The road had more unlawfull and illegal "signage error"s than any other road in England..( Except for roads that has no signs in place at all). Not even illegal signs.. Such as the M66 junction with the A56 and A682 Haslingden bypass in Lancashire. Which shares similar non regulation police parking platforms. Designed and placed by Jack-in-a-box unruly police chiefs. Fixated with ambitions of medals and knighthoods from providing her Majesty with an excess of revenue to try plug the hole in the countrys deficit that their vocations and hunting parties leisure creates. (Torture of the subjects for their pleasure) Thus. The Male (and now female) police chiefs have had a "key part" in playing their roleplay game with the Government highways department of transport and the ministers building of the crooked country. Dishonestly and at a "disadvantage to the common man". When other practicable, cheaper and less victim aimed solutions were always available to the correct and true honest thinking man. (Right honourable) Who has been cast aside to make way for the "madness" that the Chief of police usually prefers. And His LAW LORDs So that the average citizen can be given dangerous vehicles and let loose in the grounds for hunting. No LORD or MP can be considered Right or worthy of Honor. And Theresa May was notified multiple times of these problems when she was Secretary of State and the Home Office allowed the continued unlawfull and illegal use of the enforcement devices... hoping that the police would take direct responsibility, rather than the Department of Transport who set the whole thing up and thought of it in the first place, then recruited Police Chiefs to do their dirty work. While the real potential eutopia of peace was lost under the judges hammer along with the true case facts that have never been revealed since the beginning. All because These people have a joy and satisfaction in "GETTING PEOPLE". rather than rational ecological problem solving. A few scattered cases of Wins from a few Solicitors can be found in Newspaper archives. That when combined together, with hidden Crown court cases.. show that this "Game" has been played unfairly and the law has not issued justice, only competitive gameplay. When people have had to pay a solicitor thousands of pounds.. others have have had fines refunded automatically. So, please sign so we can get this National cultural administrative mess sorted out. Thank you. This Wharfedale Observer story Proves that no court appeals are required and the Council and Police + Government can and should deal with the refunds of fines and Removal of Penalty Points automatically. Parliament CAN and should (MUST) act to DIRECT the police Chiefs to refund the fines. EXACTLY as Leeds Council directed West Yorkshire Police to refund the A65 fines. Only that it should not take 3 years for the Police to admit they have been trying to cover it up & avoid liability.Wharfedale observer automatic fine refunds evidence Other videos about the Ossett bypass enforcement are available here are a few of them... With supporting evidence covering everything ive briefed here and more. youtube video 1 youtube video 2 youtube video 3 Youtube video 4 Please see these for the full evidence, including other enforcement sites.FULL Ossett bypass investigation evidence. Ossett bypass forum discussion evidenceCampaign forums and website.www.bentcop.boards.netEvidence on the incorrect use of police laser devices and other topics.http://bentcop.boards.net/thread/117/experiments-infra-light-vehicle-styliehttp://bentcop.boards.net/board/1/mobile-safety-camera-tricks-misuseAlso a 38 Degrees petition here:https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/to-force-investigation-of-illegal-speed-entrapment-sites

www.bentcop.biz E-petitions
10,615 supporters
Petitioning Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth (Her Majesty the Queen, Buckingham palace, London, SW1A 1AA)

Refund Of Macclesfield Mill Lane RED Light Camera Convictions

To The Houses of Parliament & other decision makers for Refund Of the Macclesfield Mill Lane RED Light Camera Most recent investigation measurements Video evidence. https://youtu.be/wkNaqG3jl9s  The investigation research and case topic about the Macclesfield RED light camera is on the main bentcop.boards.net petitions information site > Macclesfield traffic light camera investigationshttp://bentcop.boards.net/thread/91/macclesfield-silk-fixed-light-camera Macclesfield traffic light camera investigations The Main findings were that:1. The Stop line is incorrect size and too similar to a different type of stop line. (stop then give way line) it is by law an obstruction in the road. (330-350mm instead of the required 200 or 300mm) (Stop/give way is 400mm) 2. The Triangle traffic light warning sign is not the correct distance, earlier down the road. Where the Speed camera enforcement sign is, a few sets of traffic lights earlier. 3. The 40mph signs to indicate change speed limit to approaching traffic are within the 30mph Traffic regulation order area of the cameras 2nd photograph zone. The signs are not aligned straight, are below the minimum wear and too faded off. Also a traffic light is placed in front of them, obscuring the view of the sign/s. Rendering them not visible to assimilate on approach. 4. The Traffic light camera is installed on a curved, bent road.. when it should be straight for 40 meters so that lorrys can enter the magnetic field that lies under the road ,in a straight line, so that the detection time is accurate to the decimal of a second. (which the equipment is set up to be accurate to) because Different size and metal weight of vehicles react to the magnetic field at different delayed times and you need it to be accurate so you can work out what the vehicle distance was when the amber light was displayed. For critical legislative defence and prosecution purposes, to give evidence of if that type of vehicle at that speed could or could not be stopped in time on approach course. Or even if the driver saw the light at the second decimal that it turned to amber in order to react in the 3 seconds it had to stop the vehicle. (see highway code safe stopping distances (previously emergency stopping distances) 5. Various other issues with distracting advertising & oversized destination sign boards, and the timing of approach changes earlier down the road at slow speeds (under 25mph). Also The OGD over ground detectors linked to the change sequence initiation, and distance covered for speed limit at different road sections and in different lanes over average. What is this petition for? and Why Should you sign this Petition? Ok... so... Does that matter? Why does it matter? If you have not read the main page and watched the links there including the other petitions, please do. Otherwise.. here is why you should sign! Road Signs & Markings need to be placed correctly in order to give drivers adequate warning of directions that need to be followed. Also they need to be in place to prescriptive requirements and configurations to give legal EFFECT to any regulation that has been placed. Or else by law, it does not even require it to be OBSERVED in the first place. Which translated to this: That if the Council and Police cannot be bothered to go out of the way to ensure that the road signage & directions are as legally required, then the drivers by law do not have to bother to go out of their way to ensure that they have notived and complied with any signs, including consolidating any uncertainty of if the speed limit on the road is even correct, or in error.. or if they have correctly evaluated the speed limit themselves based on other similar roads that they drive on that are the exact same profile and width, and length, with the same safety features. (consistency in roads is a legal duty of the government to ensure) These Road signs & Markings must be placed & maintained. The devices installed by the police cannot be used as evidence to prosecute any driver, if the Road markings and signs are not correct as prescribed by the Department of Transports manual chapter books. The agreement and legislation concerning the use of the equipment is governed by these conditions of use of home office approved devices. I have found that, for reasons yet unknown (i say deceptive purposes, which i am trying to prove), road signs and markings have been placed incorrectly and not maintained at road sites, that are at places where money has been spent to place enforcement cameras & equipment. But not spent on making certain the road signage is correct & in good condition. This is the case at the Macclesfield RED light Traffic light camera at the Silk road Mill lane junction, Macclesfield. Where the Traffic Light camera/speed camera has not been legaly enforceable for about 7 years. This is just one example of Many. And drivers have been prosecuted unlawfully by the Police directed & Led prosecutions also collaborated with the CPS. Thus I request that all authorities concerned work together to "Correct" these "errors" in Law enforcement that have been allowed to continue against misled drivers. & for the Police, Crown Prosecution service & Courts to work together quickly to refund money to drivers & remove Points & disqualifications from Driving Licences, as soon as possible. So that Drivers are not further Punnished, when in Law no Offences have been made by the Drivers at the Traffic Light camera site. There have been cases already where refunds have been automatically given, such as the A65 Rawdon speed cameras in Leeds and the M42/M40 motorway near Birmingham. Yet the truth has not been made public that these type of sites are everywhere and specially designed & placed. And the connection between them is co-ordinated and in fact a police & Highways government buisness strategy. I have Evidence to support my claims. Here, A local council website confirms that unlawful road signs (and markings) are an obstruction to driving in the road. They Are illegal and must be reported. (Wakefield Council) https://youtu.be/eDJs73TpVv0 The measurements and investigations of the Macclesfield RED light camera, confirming that there is multiple examples of unlawfull road signage at the camera site. https://youtu.be/wkNaqG3jl9s An example of a correctly prescribed and lawfully placed road marking to enforce a traffic light camera, in the same Cheshire police jurisdiction as the Macclesfield camera. To compare to the video evidence of the incorrect, unlawfull signs and markings. https://youtu.be/DUYu5iu7ya4 A conversation, of many similar ones, with Local Council Management contractors, who are qualified in the Road markings and placement manuals. Who can give Professional witness evidence in a Court. They confirm my reading & interpretation of the Road signs manual & Law is correct. To add to other confirmations of BBC5 live, newspaper and council website evidence that i have been correct in my evaluations & measurements. https://youtu.be/EZyLPqo8diA A example of a virtual legal representative, to the Courts complaints departments and the Police, Council and CPS on behalf of all drivers. http://youtu.be/iMz1dOzsSAw On my information site, in the Macclesfield topic there, I also go through a learning journey where i find that the device is not accurate for measuring the speed of different types of vehicle profiles. And the equipment has been designed in law to only obtain evidence for prosecution and ommit evidence that would give clarity to the events or reveal the equipments inaccuracys. Also the critical defence evidence would be before the photographs were even taken. Thus the evidence proves nothing in relation to the law, other than a very un-usefull photograph set that has little way of being confirmed for any proper measurement purposes. And is Tailored to execute a swift and solid prosecution case only. Not establish true facts and circumstances. I have reason to believe that the reasons behind the road signage not being lawfully correct, is two fold. Firstly, it misleads drivers by not being adequate. Thus the police & council obtain more convictions & revenue from the cameras. Secondly, if any police, lawyers or esteemed persons are caught by the camera, it gives them points of law to argue over in defence. Unfortunately this defence is on the most part, closed off to the general public, so that only qualified persons are allowed to use the defence, while other drivers are obstructed from using it at early stages of the proceedings were the police would usually be required to investigate. (this has been replaced by the fast track system) because of the reason of unprescribed road signs being the fault None of the drivers by law could have been convicted. A rare circumstance where a magistrates decision making jurisdiction is reduced. In fact the entire case is non prosecutable from its initiation. as the evidence was never viable for use by the police. And all persons were under legal obligation to reveal the true legal status of the road markings and signage at every stage. This is only one example of an entire network of similar locations across the nation. Where speed limits and traffic lights have been designed & placed "inconsistently" on purpose so that drivers travelling around are presented with a new trick or con.. for each county or police constabulary that they drive through. Thus each Chief Police officer is his own "Highway man" of his own countys road jurisdictions. Earning himself reward and promotion for his hunting traps. & all Courts and Solicitors answer only to his authority. As if he were Lord of the County. The police and courts have Vehemently denied these claims and have obstructed all challenges against their organised collaborated strategys. The defence solicitors have also been working for gain and proffit from this system, playing for that team rather than a true representation of defence for the general public. Multiple cases have been reaped out of cases where only one case would have been sufficient. And in many cases disqualified drivers who were prosecuted at sites where road signage was incorrect... have been made to pay high fees at Crown courts to defend their driving licences, when the Crown court could not hear appeal cases. Because only a magistrates court could hear cases. Yet they refused to correct mountains of accumulated error and complaint, which would effect ongoing cases rendering those not even viable for hearing due to "ongoing matter" concerns in connection. If you sign this petition, it will not only be helping drivers who have been unlawfully convicted at Macclesfield. It will help put pressure on the Police & Courts to refund drivers who have been unlawfully convicted at other roads in other counties by other police forces all over the country. Many have been refunded in a few cases, proving that it is possible and real. Only that the Police & government do not want to reveal the true extent of the moral blunder, due to risk of rioting and political consequences. Even though the county cannot move forward without these socio-psychological behavior administrative conduct issues being confronted. Why is it important to sign? Even if you do not think that the road signs are important, or if you think the drivers still deserve punnishment for the driving events... we cannot have the Highways & Police staff placing and operating unlawful signs. Also, they have been lying. In truth this is much more than a petition about road signs. It is the tip of the iceberg to initiate a better more honest and fair society. And that cannot be achieved without acceptig there are dishonest people in government who have taken advantage of the general public when they had positions of trust and responsibility. We do not want dishonest police, councilors and Mps. It sets a bad example to the public and we do not want to promote dishonesty and lying to society. The signs are supposed to be 'as prescribed' for a reason. Because the original designer of the road sign system worked out a reaction and psychology time and system for correct response time and safety. Thus we need to follow the law and manuals properly. Otherwise Change the laws, and if they have not been followed, it needs to be acknowledged by the government officially. Not evaded.. The government know about this scandal and it is their fault. Changing legislation will not help, if it is the legislation that the police are not following correctly in the first place. The police are trying to make people think that the road signs are not that important, or only important if its a school photography PR stunt. when they know all too well that psychology governs driver reaction and actions. The police is built of police presence and psychology.. the uniform, horses, and reward system. The police cannot face the public with this level of corruption, as the police is built on heroic rewards. Unfortunately the rewards have taken presidence over truth and honesty conduct & behavoir policy. And they have not protected the system. Only themselves. For example, Andrew Jones MP has now tried to remove the requirement to have two terminal signs to inform you of a change in the speed limit. And has removed the requirement to place repeater signs. (even though the TSRDG is not the sign configuration of placement manual as that is the Traffic signs manual chapter 3) This is very dangerous to the average driver, who relied on these signs to be subconsciously informed and updated with important guidance for driving. Especially with inconsistent speed limits. Andrew, now is trying to make people believe the signs are not needed. While intending escaping present & Future liability for prosecutions. Although there is a doomsday book backlog of illegal & unlawful prosecutions against the Honest Working Driver, Which has been the fuel for expanding the Governments speed camera network. Andrew Jones does not want to pay for the maintenance and upkeep of road signs. & is claiming that they are "clutter". This intends to get Andrew Jones & Pat Macloughlin out of legal responsibility for past prosecutions where road signs have been put wrong on purpose on Department of Transport roads. Yet he is contradicting that action, by placing "More" clutter, gantry's and signs on motorways, which confuse drivers even more. And he is removing the greatest road safety asset feature of the United Kingdom - The Hard Shoulder, so that he can operate his 40mph speed cameras, when Heavy Goods Vehicles then have to break down on dangerous lanes which are immediately in use, instead of being safely out of the way. A Road tax increase could render enforcement cameras extinct, by merit of road safety features that are not associated in any way with crime and punishment. This would, reduce the polices role, along with fair wages almost remove the polices role completely.. other than reducing them to be a covert undercover online "social nanny" voieur network, when they cannot even be trusted to do their existing job honestly. They are the last people we want to be given control of cameras and computer surveillance equipment. The deficit cannot be controlled by fines to drivers. It is the Ministers vocational imaginations that bleeds the country's funds dry. Millennium domes and toll roads. Dangerous movie screen advertising boards that distract drivers, while others are banned for simply holding mobile phones, yet in America it an everyday skill. The government plays dangerous safety games between its departments that conflict in law and safety. It is believed that Andrew Jones is not fit for purpose as a Minister. Because he cannot understand that it is the public road users themselves who should decide which roads get built and changed, not a hand full of MPs whos real intent is not safety at all, but simply continuation of an "Adult playset" which if made truly save and convenient would bore the Mp's to death. Except when they are following young secreatrial staff around of duty who they can employ to use as defence in the defunkt government complaints departments that are instead there to defend against complaints.. Here is the Legislation for the Driving Offences. Not that I have Substituted the word speed, with the words 'movement and motion'. Because in the Dictionary it states that the word speed means to move, and or to start moving or stop moving. Thus I believe that the legislation covers traffic light/speed camera combination devices, as well as just speed cameras. Because there is still a limit of movement or motion to be observed when a red light or amber sign sign shows. Such as the speed limit at the stop line is 0 mph. Unless you believe you cannot stop safely in time, in which case an amber light is to be treated as if it were a green light. There is also new legislation in the 1991 road traffic act, where the law states a road musy comply with the Home office approval regulations for the devices. And those rules state that to use the device to obtain viable evidence, the road signs and markings must comply with the TSRGD and traffic signs manuals. I have linked to online copys of the manuals in .pdf files on the main https://www.bentcop.biz webpage, if you scroll down you will see pictures of the manuals that you can click on. 1)For the purpose of securing that adequate (and lawfull) guidance is given to drivers of motor vehicles as to whether any, (by law) and if so what, limit of movement or motion is to be observed on any road, it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State, in the case of a road for which he is the traffic authority, to erect and maintain to the standard stated in those manuals the traffic signs and place the markings in such positions as may be (is) prescriptively requisite for that purpose.(2)In the case of any other road, it is the duty of the local traffic authority(a)to erect and maintain traffic signs in such positions (configurations) as may be (is) requisite in order to give effect to general or other directions (in law) given by the Secretary of State for the purpose mentioned in subsection (1) above, and(b)to alter or be required to remove (illegal) traffic signs as may be requisite in order to give effect (or remove obstruction) to such directions, either in consequence of the making of an order by the Secretary of State or otherwise.   For more information visit the information site at www.bentcop.boards.net & Sign other petitions at https://www.bentcop.biz Thank you. https://www.bentcop.biz

www.bentcop.biz E-petitions
1,605 supporters
Petitioning Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth (Buckingham Palace)

Refund of M66/Haslingden Bypass Road Traffic Offences

The End of the M66 Motorway that is the A56 Haslingden Bypass has a History of problems in its past & planning and is associated with the M62 junction 12/13 disaster design.. Litigation needs to be brought against the Highways agency, local authority Rossendale council and the Police for multiple accidents on the unsigned not lawful road and illegal speeding convictions. Where the insurance policy is void due to non compliance with Traffic signs manual and TSRGD requirements. The Legally required end of motorway road signage has been incorrect for many. many years and there is over a entore mile of non present speed limit signage on the lit carriageway which it required to be in place. The 50mph Terminal speed limit signs which this illegally signed misleading section runs into are also not large enough and are not legal. This set-up combined with non regulation police parking platforms is a designed and planned speed entrapment site to mislead drivers. Besides police patrol bikes & cars operating on the road, it had been the site in recent years of a mobile police safety camera van. This van has failed to carry out correct road signage checks and assess the safety of nearby crossing. I also propose that a foot bridge be built across the road to replace the crossing. Drivers have been prosecuted and convicted illegally on the road and the fines should be refunded along with the Penalty points being removed from driving licences. Litigation should be brought against Lancashire Police, Rossendale Council and the Highways agency/Department of Transport for multiple accidents that have occured on the unsigned road because the insurance for the road will be void if it has not complied with TSRGD and the updated Traffic signs manuals. I believe that the road has been set up with the signage incorrect on purpose. I also believe that the 50mph speed limit, for that road profile is inconsistent with the speed limit on other similar roads across the united kingdom. Thus is misleading to migrating drivers working across & around the UK. Please see my information & own investigations > see the police speeding video sample Evaluation, investigation and assessment of road Haslingden bypass police sample video http://bentcop.boards.net/thread/84/m66-a56-motorway-history-problems

www.bentcop.biz E-petitions
450 supporters