Fund for P. Smith
Started 3 petitions
Wells Fargo Refuses To Payout My Deceased Mom's Savings
My Mother passed away on April 13, 2018. She had Savings of about $40,000 in Wells Fargo. Today is June 18, 2018 ~ that is 61 days ago. Being the sole survivor and Administratrix of her estate I have paid all her known debts. I have also notified Wells Fargo and supplied them with all the required documentation they required before they'd send me the savings. I have contacted Wells Fargo close to 20 times and please believe me they transfer me to different extensions each time. After many unkept promises to phone me the next day, they then claimed that they haven't received the documents. When they said that I asked for that person's Fax # and immediately faxed all the documents again. So having lost my Dad, Brother & Sister at a young age and now my Mom at 84 years I am left with an unfair, unkind run around by the Bank that claims to be the largest. Wells Fargo does not need my Mom's Savings ~ I do. Attempts to get their Corporate Officers involved has been unsuccessful. Please support my Petition and tell Wells Fargo enough is enough. In fact it is too much. They need to disburse the funds post haste. Your signature will help my heavy heart and hopefully Wells Fargo will be ashamed and do the right thing. Rich BlessingsP. Smith For those who want in-depth details: (1) My son and I went to an attorney who prepared the exact Courtpaper work required by Law. Then it was signed, notarized and given tothe Court where a judge signed it right in our presence. (2) Then we attempted to present it to a large local WF branch. They refused to look at it and gave contact info to the WF department to which it must go. It was 2,000 miles from us...so we had to deal by mail, phone & or fax. (3) In spite of also filing all WF's required additional paperwork they have given us atotal run around. Multiple phone calls, claims they never received her docs, faxed second complete set of docs, broken promises, and more runaround. (4) WF is an international bank - and remember they were in a pickle with the Justice Department for setting up millions of fake accounts. This just shows they wilfully ignore the law by their unethical non-help for account holders or inheritors. Respectfully Peggy Smith .
Public Petition for Sua Sponte Call for Rehearing En Banc
In 2010, Daniel Smith wrote the FDA to ask if they had any legal valid objection to his operating under a First and Fourteenth Amendment private healthcare membership association. The FDA never responded. A year later, without warning, the agency stormed his home and business, seized bank accounts, and spent the next two years pouring through emails to find something to indict over. In 2013, Smith was indicted by false and hearsay testimony using contortions of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. The prosecution employed the media to propagandize the public on the merits of its case. In 2015, in a shocking display of political injustice, Smith was wrongly convicted in what bystanders described as a sham trial operating under court-directed verdict in which the government was allowed to confuse the jury, contort the law, and not prove all the elements, while Mr. Smith was denied his right to present a case in defense. After two and a half years in prison, the Ninth Circuit summarily denied Smith's appeal by memorandum disposition drafted by a clerk, ignoring upwards of ten material dispositive issues, impermissibly amending the indictment and conflicting with intra-circuit, extra-circuit, and U.S. Supreme Court precedent. If a mandate is permitted to issue under these circumstances, it will have the effect of setting a new standard for denying the right to a fair trial and meaningful appeal, take on the appearance of bias, and continue to erode the public's confidence in the administration of justice. Moreover, the Ninth Circuit will have created conflicting law and the FDA will have significantly advanced its reach beyond the intent of Congress. Our only hope now is that reasoning circuit judges will carefully review and sua sponte call for rehearing en banc to correct this miscarriage in justice. Please read and sign if you support this petition, which has been launched by friends and family of Daniel Smith and the support of the natural health community around the world. Respectfully ask each judge of the Ninth Circuit to rehear Daniel Smith's case en banc.
Petition to Stay Daniel Smith's Sentence and End Malaria Death
If you support Daniel Smith and the bid to end malaria and other needless diseases, please sign the following (abridged) petition today. The full version can be read at: http://standbydaniel.com/stay-daniel-smiths-sentence-end-malaria-death-toll-in-2017-petition AND play Daniel's video at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcH0j0YynzU To: The Honorable Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America We the diverse and freedom-loving People of this great nation, in concert with concerned citizens representing over 110 nations across the globe, earnestly petition your clemency in the manner of Reprieve, pursuant to Art. II, Sect. 2, Cl. 1 of the U.S. Constitution, by granting the immediate temporary stay of the 51-month sentence of health-freedom advocate, political prisoner, husband, father, grandfather and friend, Louis Daniel Smith, through the conclusion of his appeals. This request for extraordinary relief is based upon extraordinary circumstances - as you may gather by our number, diversity, and comments. Current Status: Daniel Smith is presently serving a 51-month sentence in BOP custody at Seatac FDC in Washington State (Inmate #74882-065). His prosecution - stemming from alleged violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act - proceeded from: (a) a legally deficient indictment; (b) erroneous application of established law; (c) insufficient evidence of criminal intent; and (d) a defective trial in which Mr. Smith was denied the opportunity to present a defense. These substantial issues of fact and law are the subject of a languishing appeal, meticulously briefed and filed by court-appointed counsel on Mr. Smith's behalf. Legal scholars predict a high likelihood of a full reversal. A copy of the brief is included herewith. However, by the time Mr. Smith's appeal has run its course, he will have served three quarters of a wrongful sentence with no recourse at law for the years stolen from him and his family. This is due, in part, to the Ninth Circuit's heavy caseload and the common tactic of delaying appeals. It is also needlessly costing the government over $44,000.00 a year. Mr. Smith has exhausted all lower remedies by first requesting release pending his appeal from the court. The trial judge, however, denied release, speculating that Mr. Smith could be a flight risk because funds raised by supporters pretrial "could" have been used to secure a means to leave the country. This baseless argument belies the following facts: (a) the DOJ/BOP has designated Mr. Smith community custody, granted him multiple unsupervised furloughs and currently employs him as a facility town driver; (b) he was on pretrial release for over two years without incident; (c) he has already relinquished his passport to the US Marshals; (d) he maintains strong family and community ties; (e) his trustee submitted an affidavit swearing that the funds in question had already been depleted, all spent on legitimate expenses in preparation for trial; and (f) he has already served, without incident, over half the sentence relevant to his projected release date to home confinement. Mr. Smith is clearly not a flight risk. He has no prior criminal background and is no danger to the community. He has been a target of special interests for being entrepreneurial and a humanitarian - for being truly American. Mr. Smith is loved by many from all over the world. The system has failed. The only just remedy is to stay Mr. Smith's sentence and release him pending the conclusion of his appeals. Read the full petition at: http://standbydaniel.com/stay-daniel-smiths-sentence-end-malaria-death-toll-in-2017-petition Conclusion: We the People, therefore, humbly petition you, Mr. President, for the Reprieve of Mr. Smith's sentence, so that he may return home to support his family, including his wife and children, and his ailing father, whose heart is failing and who need his support. We are not asking for an Executive Pardon, simply a Reprieve. Should he not prevail in his appeals, Mr. Smith would, without fail, finish any remaining portion of any sentence and do so with our full support. 28 C.F.R. Sect. 1.11 informs that the regulations for the Department of Justice as it pertains to Executive Clemency "are advisory only and for the internal guidance of the Department of Justice personnel. They [do not] restrict the authority granted to the President under Article II, section 2 of the Constitution", which states that the President "[s]hall have the Power to grant Reprieve and Pardons for the Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Thank you, Mr. President Trump, for considering this petition in Mr. Smith's and the public's greater interest, and for your promise to make America great again.