Archdiocesan Office for Human Development
AOHD (Archdiocesan Office for Human Development) promotes activities concerning charity, integral human development, justice and peace within the Catholic Church’s Kuala Lumpur Archdiocese. It operates under the purview of the AOHD Secretariat and Board of Management, with Rev. Mitchel Anthony as Priest Delegate.
Started 2 petitions
Say No! to Climate Change
MALAYSIANS SAY NO! TO CLIMATE CHANGE Backgrounder - Response - Action INTRODUCTION As part of Lenten Campaign 2015, the Office for Human Development (AOHD) of the Archdiocese of Kuala Lumpur seeks to address an integral human development issue that requires a ‘justice and peace’ approach. One such critical issue is global climate change. Accordingly, this signature campaign is aimed at enlisting the commitment of participant signatories to individual and community actions, and also to request the Prime Minister of Malaysia to actively address the issue of Climate Change from a national perspective. BACKGROUNDER What is Climate Change? In short, climate change occurs when long-term weather patterns are altered largely through human activity. Global warming is one measure of climate change, and is a rise in the average global temperature (www.davidsuzuki.org). In the recent past, there has also been a marked increase in the occurrence of storms, such as the freak storm (‘twister’) that hit Pendang, Kedah, on 14 October last year. How does Climate Change happen? Insulation: Life on Earth is possible because of the warmth of the sun. While some of this incoming solar radiation bounces back into space, a small portion of it is trapped by the delicate balance of gases that make up our atmosphere. Without this layer of insulation, Earth would be another frozen planet. Carbon dioxide is the most important gas in this layer of insulation. Carbon Dioxide: Carbon is stored all over the planet — in plants, soil, the ocean, and even people. We release it into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide through activities such as burning petrol and cutting down trees. As a result, today’s atmosphere contains 42 percent more carbon dioxide than it did before the industrial era (which began about 1760, more than 250 years ago). Disruption: We have released so much carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that our planet's atmosphere is now like a thick, heat-trapping blanket. By disrupting the atmospheric balance that keeps the climate stable, we are now seeing extreme effects around the globe. It’s like a thermostat that's spoilt – it doesn't work the way it should. Global Warming: As a result of excessive greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the climate changes, and it gets warmer. Extreme weather events also become more common. Global warming has already begun. Since 1900, the global average temperature has risen by 0.7 degree Celsius, and the northern hemisphere is substantially warmer than at any point during the past 1,000 years. Why is Climate Change a serious issue? Global Temperature Increase: According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://ipcc.ch/), if greenhouse gas emissions are reduced significantly, the rise in global temperature will be about 2 degrees Celsius towards the end of this century (year 2100). However, if no action is taken, it is likely that the rise in temperature could be more than 4 degrees Celsius. Impact of Temperature Increase: A two-degree Celsius rise in global temperature will lead to increased floods and storms, wider spread of diseases and increased risk of extinction of certain species; while a four-degree rise will lead to millions of people being exposed to increased water stress and coastal flooding, significant extinctions, extreme food shortages and severe health impact. How does Climate Change affect Malaysia? As a result of persistent climate change, Malaysians would face many serious challenges: harsh agricultural, social, economic and environmental realities, including the following: · Reduction in crop yield · Threat to national food security · Land flooding & abandonment · Reduction of water availability · Higher frequency of floods & flood damage · Overuse of pesticides · Loss of habitats · Loss of biodiversity RESPONSE What is our responsibility as Catholics in facing Climate Change? Catholic Social Teaching: One of the seven key themes of Catholic Social Teaching is the Care for God’s Creation, which reminds us of our duty to cultivate and care for the gift of Creation. Future of God’s Creation: Our Creator has given us the gift of creation; the air we breathe, the water that sustains life, the fruits of the land that nourish us, and the entire web of life without which human life cannot flourish. We believe our response to global climate change should be a sign of our respect for God’s creation. At its core, global climate change is not about economic theory or political platforms, nor about partisan advantage or interest group pressures. It is about the future of God’s creation and the one human family. It is about protecting both the human environment and the natural environment. (www.usccb.org) Poor & Vulnerable: The Catholic Church brings a distinct perspective to climate change by lifting up the moral dimensions of this issue and the needs of the most vulnerable among us. As Catholics, our faith calls us to care for all of God’s creation, especially the ‘least of these.’ Of particular concern to the Church is how climate change and the response to it will affect poor and vulnerable people. (www.catholicclimatecovenant.org) ACTION What can we do about Climate Change? Action on climate change could be achieved at two levels: as an individual, and as a citizen. As an individual in a community setting Personal · Buy goods that are minimally packaged · Recycle, Reuse, and Reduce items such as paper, plastic, glass, metal, etc. · Eat less meat, poultry and fish · Buy more local products · Read newspapers online. Community · Plant trees in community spaces, like parks · Practice carpooling · Promote waste separation · Promote more local products · Use social media for promoting awareness of climate change issues. Work · Promote a paperless office · Use public transport, carpool or walk more to work · Reduce travelling and use more digital technology for office meetings. Church · Encourage homilies on link between Faith and climate change reduction · Promote inter-faith activities on climate change issues · Grow trees and gardens in church compounds. As a citizen of Malaysia Endorse the attached letter to the Prime Minister. Your involvement as a Malaysian citizen is pertinent to this important effort. Specifically, this would involve, among others, your action or promotion of policy matters and your efforts to engage your Member of Parliament. YOUR ENDORSEMENT Consistent with our Christian Faith and our love for Malaysia, and as a specific justice and peace action for Lenten Campaign 2015, the Office for Human Development (AOHD) of the Archdiocese of Kuala Lumpur earnestly urges you to support, endorse and publicize this signature campaign. If you agree that the critical issue of climate change should be actively addressed in Malaysia at the citizen and government levels, please add your name and NRIC number to the signature campaign list. Thank you for your informed decision and considered support. In solidarity Rev. Mitchel Anthony Joseph Director Lenten Campaign 2015 Kuala Lumpur MALAYSIA
Abolish Death Penalty in Malaysia
Abolish the Death Penalty in Malaysia Introduction As part of Lenten Campaign 2013, the Office for Human Development (AOHD) of the Archdiocese of Kuala Lumpur seeks to address a social issue in Malaysia that requires a ‘justice and peace’ solution; namely, the mandatory death sentence that is meted out for several offences in Malaysia, including murder and drug trafficking. The resolution of this issue calls for the death penalty to be abolished. Accordingly, this signature campaign is to request the Prime Minister of Malaysia to abolish the death penalty. What is the Problem with the Death Penalty? The Catholic Faith teaches us that the Death Sentence is an affront to the God-given dignity of human life. Even when a person is found guilty of a heinous crime in the face of convincing or overwhelming evidence, no person, institution or State has the right to terminate a human being’s life. As such, we should be committed to perpetuating human life, and should oppose any law that provides for its termination. Why Abolish the Death Penalty Apart from the State’s duty to protect human life, the risk of sending an innocent person to death is another reason why the death penalty needs to be abolished. No human person, be it police, prosecutors, witnesses, lawyers and even judges, are infallible, and no legal system in the world is error-free.. There have been many examples of cases of miscarriage of justice, where innocent persons have been incarcerated in prison for many years, or even sentenced to death. The opportunity to right a wrong is, however, not available since death is irreversible. “The law is the law but I wish Parliament would abolish the death sentence because if a mistake is made, it would be irreversible. There are other ways of dealing with heinous crimes,” - Datuk K.C. Vohrah, former Court of Appeal judge “No criminal justice system is perfect. You take a man’s life and years later, you find out that another person did the crime. What can you do?” - Datuk Seri Nazri Abdul Aziz, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department A recent case of miscarriage of justice was the case of Chiang Kuo-ching, who was executed in Taiwan in 1997 after being convicted of sexually abusing and murdering a five-year-old girl. In 2011, Taiwan’s Ministry of Justice admitted that Chiang had been executed in error. Advocates say that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. On the contrary, in March 2012, Home Minister Dato’ Seri Hishammuddin Hussein revealed in Parliament that the mandatory death penalty has failed to act as a deterrent. Further, police statistics for the arrest of drug dealers under Section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which carries the mandatory death penalty, have shown an increase. In 2009, 2,955 were arrested under this section; in 2010, 3,700 people were arrested, whilst in 2011, 3,845 were arrested (Free Malaysia Today News, 19 March 2012: Death penalty not deterring drug trade) Death Penalty and the Church The Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI, during a general audience on 30 Nov. 2011, called on countries around the world to end the death penalty as a legal sanction. “I express my hope that your deliberations will encourage the political and legislative initiatives being promoted in a growing number of countries to eliminate the death penalty and to continue the substantive progress made in conforming penal law both to the human dignity of prisoners and the effective maintenance of public order.” – Pope Benedict XVI (Crisis Magazine, 2 Dec. 2011) The encyclical The Gospel of Life highlighted the problem of the death penalty. “… the aggressor … may not be morally responsible because of a lack of the use of reason … there is a growing tendency, both in the Church and in civil society, to demand that [the death penalty] be applied in a very limited way or even that it be abolished completely. The problem must be viewed in the context of … God’s plan for man and society.” – John Paul II (No. 55, 56; Evangelium Vitae, 25 March 1995) The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that the necessity for executing the offender does not arise in today’s situation. “ … non-lethal means are … more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person. Today … the cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity "are very rare, if not practically non-existent.” (No. 2267, 11 Oct. 1992) International Trend to Abolish the Death Penalty On 20 Dec. 2012, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a fourth resolution on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, with 111 countries voting in favour. In the Asia Pacific region, 17 countries have abolished the death penalty, while 14 countries, including Malaysia, retain it. Malaysian Efforts to Abolish the Death Sentence In 2006, the Malaysian Bar, a body representing about 14,000 lawyers, adopted a resolution calling for the abolition of the death penalty. In 2012, a second resolution was further adopted unanimously with no objections or abstentions. The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) called on the Government on 22 Oct. 2012 to review the relevance and effectiveness of capital punishment, and to join other UN member states to completely abolish the death penalty. The Association for the Promotion of Human Rights (PROHAM) stated on 3 Nov. 2012 that it ‘… recognizes that society has a moral obligation to protect human life and not to take it. As such the death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights. The death penalty is unjust. By abolishing the death penalty it affirms our condemnation of cruelty and affirms the value of human life …’ On 3 Nov. 2012, Amnesty International Malaysia, Catholic Lawyers Society Malaysia, Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET), Malaysian Physicians for Social Responsibility (MPSR), Women’s Centre for Change, Writers Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI) Malaysia, together with other organizations, called for the “abolition of the death penalty in Malaysia, for an immediate moratorium on all executions pending abolition and for the commutation of the sentences of all persons currently on death row …”. Malaysians Facing the Death Penalty More Malaysians realize that the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking is wrong, given that most persons sentenced to death for this offence are generally ‘mules’, many of whom are young people who have been tricked, or those who are financially disadvantaged. Umi Azlim Mohamad Lazim, 24, a graduate from a poor Malay family of rice farmers, admitted to having 2.9 kg of heroin in her luggage when she was arrested at the airport. She faces the death penalty in China. Yong Vui Kong of Sabah was 19 when he was sentenced to hang in 2008 for smuggling 47 grams of heroin into Singapore. About 250 other Malaysians suspected of being drug mules have been detained in countries that actively practice capital punishment, and 930 persons in Malaysia face the death penalty. Conclusion Consistent with a sacred respect for human life, and as a specific ‘justice and peace’ action for Lenten Campaign 2013, the Office for Human Development (AOHD) of the Kuala Lumpur Archdiocese earnestly urges you to support, endorse and publicize this signature campaign. If you agree that the death penalty should be repealed in Malaysia, please add your name to the signature campaign list. Thank you for your informed and considered support. In solidarity For the Archdiocese Lenten Signature Campaign 2013 Rev. Dr. Clarence Devadass Director, Archdiocese Pastoral Institute, Kuala Lumpur. 13 January 2013