If you work with children, and see one of your charges being abused or even raped, you might think you and your employer had a legal obligation to report it to the authorities. Not so. There is no legal requirement on anyone working with minors in England (Wales or Scotland) to report such incidents and concerns to the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), children's services or in the event of a 'known' crime, the police.
We are seeking the introduction of legislation which requires staff in faith groups, national sports bodies, schools and similar institutions which are defined as ‘Regulated Activities,’ [Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006] who know, suspect, or have reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting child abuse, to inform the LADO (or in appropriate circumstances children's services) so that experienced and independent assessment is introduced immediately to ensure perpetrators are stopped as soon as possible. Here is our 5 Minute guide to Mandatory Reporting
In the review published in March by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary entitled ‘Mistakes were made’ into allegations and intelligence material concerning Jimmy Savile between 1964 and 2012; recommendation #3 of just five states:
‘We consider that a system of mandatory reporting should be examined whereby those who, in the course of their professional duties, become aware of information or evidence that a child is or has been the victim of abuse should be under a legal obligation to notify their concerns to others.’
Just three months later in June the Home Affairs Committee published its report into 'Child sexual exploitation and the response to localised grooming.' Recommendation #36 under the heading 'legislation' states:
'We also recommend that the Government examine the Florida Protection of Vulnerable Persons Act passed in 2012 in order to ascertain whether the mandatory reporting of child abuse could, and should, be implemented in England and Wales.'
It certainly should be implemented, but only in 'Regulated Activities' and any similar institutional settings that fall outside this legal definition.
It is estimated that only 5% of child abuse is reported, yet Serious Case Reviews repeatedly reveal that professionals and others suspected years before that abuse was taking place but failed to inform the authorities. This is why outrageous child sex offences have gone undetected for years. In many cases, such as Hillside First School in Weston super Mare, the abuses continued for more than a decade.
All too often when an allegation is reported to the person in charge of a ‘Regulated Activity’, the LADO is not informed because there is no clear legal mandate for anyone to do so - and no legal sanction if they do not.
This lack of legislation seriously undermines the culture of child protection in all Regulated Activities where children are cared for by responsible adults other than their parents. For anyone who finds this state of affairs challenging to absorb, please refer to paragraph #5 page 3 of the NSPCC’s Introduction to Child Protection Legislation in the UK (May 2012). The lack of clear legislation presents all Regulated Activities with a conflict of interest when the worst happens.
The government’s current approach to child protection is grounded upon statutory ‘guidance’ rather than law. This cannot match the cunning and deceit of committed perpetrators, nor does it offer clarity of action to well meaning but unsupported professionals.
Instead of trying to change human nature, legislation needs to be introduced with policies and procedures that acknowledge the host of conflicting human dynamics that arise when faced with concerns of abuse.
• Mandatory reporting of allegations and concerns will address the distorting factors in what can appear to be complex situations. A headteacher or a bishop might wish to protect his colleague’s or church’s reputation but if he risks a criminal conviction and a hefty fine by so doing then he will think it a poor exchange.
• Under a system of mandatory reporting, staff in schools or hospitals who suspect abuse would have no choice but to report or face prosecution. This means every employee is better protected from blame and/or recrimination. Being faced with a conviction, prison or a fine cuts across friendship or loyalty to an institution, and there is no doubt where 'duty' lies.
• A criminal sanction for failure to report also removes any perceived need to weigh up whether the concerns reported are serious enough, or who to believe before having to decide what to do: the person reporting is freed from having to make complex judgements about who is telling the truth and they will know they are following and protected by the law when they report as opposed to whistleblowing - please listen to this chilling 2 minute audio file from BBC5 Live 'call in' about mandatory reporting.
Too often the decision is made to cover up and/or minimise wrong doing including any abuse of power perpetrated by officers and staff of the regulated activity. This is true for failures in schools such as Hillside First School Weston Super Mare and churches including the Diocese of Chichester and the Archdiocese of Birmingham, Local Authority children’s services such as Rochdale, Haringey, North Wales, and public service institutions such as the BBC and the NHS which also have questions to answer as the Savile inquiries continue to reveal.
Countries which operate mandatory reporting include Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Spain, Sweden, USA, and now the Republic of Ireland which on the 10th November 2012 held a referendum which approved mandatory reporting.
Failing to refer in the Republic is now an offence which carries a tariff of up to five years imprisonment. The new law will positively impact the prevention of abuse in all institutional settings in Ireland.
The day before the referendum The Guardian published this article on the vote in which Tanya Ward, the chief executive of the Children's Rights Alliance suggested the whole of the UK should embrace mandatory reporting ‘because institutions tend to put their own interests before those of children.’
In England (Wales and Scotland) children are on their own and have no legal right to expect the LADO (or equivalent in Wales and Scotland) to be informed of their suspected or known abuse.
This must change - please remember to Tweet us in just 2 clicks using the button at the top right of this page - and Follow us @MandateNow
@MandateNow is the political and legislative arm of Paula Barrow’s highly successful 'Daniel's Law' petition which shares our objectives for the introduction of Mandatory Reporting in all Regulated Activities. Please visit the Daniel's Law website here.