Rescind Ontario Regulation 274/12, “Hiring Practices”
  • Petitioning Hon. Liz Sandals, Government of Ontario

This petition will be delivered to:

Minister of Education
Hon. Liz Sandals, Government of Ontario

Rescind Ontario Regulation 274/12, “Hiring Practices”

    1. Angie Potts
    2. Petition by

      Angie Potts

      Toronto, Canada

Ontario Regulation 274/ 12, “Hiring Practices” ( http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_120274_e.htm ) must be revoked, in favour of an alternative that takes into account the various circumstances of teachers across the province of Ontario.

Regulation 274 is flawed for various reasons, including (but not limited to) the following:

- Despite charges of nepotism in hiring, most teachers are hired in this province based on merit. Previously, principals and school boards had the ability to hire teachers based on proven dedication and hard work. It is necessary that the Ministry of Education recognize that there are many factors that make up a great teacher: personality, energy, education, experience (both within and outside of the classroom), interests, attitude, and many more. Seniority is only one small factor. Regulation 274 is no longer allowing principals to reward and recognize merit in our province’s future educators.

- In reading through Regulation 274, it is apparent that no safeguards or considerations have been put in place for teachers who, for various reasons, may need to relocate within the province. Ontario is a province with an area of over 1 million square kilometers, and over 70 different school boards. Ontario families often opt to relocate for various reasons, including family illness, spousal job promotion or transfer, or simply personal preference. As the Regulation stands, a teacher with any number of years of experience (2? 5? 15?) with an Ontario school board would have to choose between one of the following options if they needed to relocate:

A) Commute for hours each day in order to remain employed with their current board (this option may not even be feasible, depending on the distance of the move), or,

B) Apply to a new board and (under Regulation 274), begin at the bottom of the seniority and hope that (despite, say, 10 years of Ontario teaching experience) they may eventually make their way to the top of the list and “earn” a contract once again.

“Option A” means the teacher must commute long hours and spend less time with both their family and their students. Option A would likely mean that these teachers would not have much time left to dedicate to extra-curricular activities or to plan rich, meaningful lessons for students. “Option B,” frankly, just doesn’t seem fair. A teacher, who has proven through years of service that they are a quality educator, should not be required to start from square one again. Few established professionals (likely carrying mortgages, and with families to support) would have the financial stability to be able to take this gamble. The whole system seems flawed, rashly implemented, and not thought through for all possible scenarios.

- What we need in Ontario is a way to recognize teaching experience province-wide. Teachers across Ontario provide the same curriculum, follow the same expectations, and are regulated by the same governing body (The Ontario College of Teachers). If regulations such as Ontario Regulation 274 and Bill 115 are going to be implemented on a province-wide level, then experience and seniority must be recognized provincially as well.

In as competitive a job market as exists in Ontario boards of education, should we not be putting Ontario students first and rewarding the “best and brightest” teachers with jobs, rather than the ones who have simply been around the longest? Where is the incentive to prove oneself and go above-and-beyond, if an Ontario teacher needs to simply bide their time and wait out the years until they reach the top of a seniority list? Regulation 274 recognizes only one factor: Seniority.

In order to provide the best quality education for the children in Ontario’s classrooms, Ontario Regulation 274 must be rescinded. This regulation does not recognize the talents of new teachers, nor does it credit the experience of teachers who need to relocate within the province and seek employment with a new Ontario school board. Surely, there must be another way to regulate hiring practices for Ontario teachers that does not affect students and educators so drastically.

To:
Hon. Liz Sandals, Government of Ontario, Minister of Education
Rescind Ontario Regulation 274/12, “Hiring Practices”

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 3,000 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Mike Tombs TORONTO, CANADA
      • 16 days ago

      My wife an I would like to move from the Greater Toronto Area to Kingston, as my wife's father has recently passed away and her mother could use the help. Under this regulation, I am unable to even get on Kingston's supply list, much less transfer my 10 years of teaching experience. Please name another career which so severely limits perfectly transferrable skills like reg 274 does to the teaching profession.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Lance Lefebvre ARVA, ON, CANADA
      • 18 days ago

      This regulation has prevented me from achieving full-time work as a part-time contract teacher. Additionally, it has prevented me from moving to another city where I would have to start at the bottom of seniority despite my several years of experience.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Kathleen Frank OTTAWA, CANADA
      • 19 days ago

      I have just graduated from teacher education. I've wanted to be a teacher since I was 5 years old and now I have to jump through hoops to even get close to a permanent position.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Joanne C. MARKHAM, CANADA
      • 25 days ago

      This is important to me, because this regulation makes it impossible for me to find any stable teaching position for the next 5 years or more. And I am a new teacher who is excited to have my own class, but I was one of many unlucky ones who got on right when the regulation was put in place, and people I know who got on two months or even a month ahead of me are now much further ahead because they were still allowed to work in longer term jobs despite senority. How then is this regulation fair now? If anything, it just makes this more frustrating for me as a new teacher.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Derrick McDonald MISSISSAUGA, CANADA
      • about 1 month ago

      This is important because I have a deep concern for equity; this regulation is the polar opposite.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.