• Petitioned The Supreme Court Of The United States

This petition was delivered to:

The Supreme Court Of The United States

TELL THE SUPREME COURT: Rein in Over-Sentencing & Prosecutorial Power

    1. UNJUSTIFIED - the movie
    2. Petition by

      UNJUSTIFIED - the movie

      New York, NY

In our current legal system, prosecutors have tremendous power to choose and amplify charges while the Judges they argue before have extreme discretion as to how they hand down sentences. And when this happens, we are faced with the shocking reality that stands in direct contrast to our nation’s claim to guarantee the accused a fair trial.

The Supreme Court is currently in a position to address these issues in the case of 'Sholom Rubashkin v. The United States of America.' The case is before them for review.

It is not the guilty verdict that demands the Supreme Court’s attention, but the charges and harsh sentencing of a seemingly over-zealous judicial system. It is critical that the Supreme Court agree to review this case as it stands to set legal precedent for certain gray areas of the current law, like mandatory minimum sentencing, over-criminalization, prosecutorial power and the boundaries of the relationship between judges and the prosecutors who argue before them.

Tell the Supreme Court to ACCEPT this case. Tell them to HEAR this case. Tell them to rein in the Justice System they preside over -- a system that currently sees over 95% of all cases end in a plea bargain rather than a constitutionally guaranteed trial by jury. Prosecutors are routinely piling on charges to create "slam dunk" cases and improve their personal "conviction rates." Judges are sentencing for crimes with wildly varied results -- your punishment may no longer fit the crime so much as it fits the courtroom in which you are tried.

In the case of Mr. Rubashkin, the federal government turned the largest immigration raid in US history into a bank fraud case concerning a $35 million business loan. Rubashkin was found guilty on 86 of 91 counts related to fraud. For those crimes, he faced over 1,000 years in prison. At sentencing, prosecutors sought a life sentence until six former US Attorney Generals and other Justice Department veterans wrote to the judge objecting to such harsh punishment. Prosecutors revised their request to 25 years in prison; Judge Linda Reade sentenced Mr. Rubashkin to 27 years - more than many other white-collar criminals whose crimes far exceeded the value of Mr. Rubashkin's.

A subsequent Freedom Of Information Act request returned documents demonstrating Judge Reade had worked with prosecutors in the months leading up to the initial raid on Mr. Rubashkin's business, creating what his defense argues “at the very least the appearance of impropriety.’

America is a nation of laws. Those laws must be administered fairly and equally, not separately and with creative discretion.

To those we grant power, we demand accountability.

Tell the Supreme Court to HEAR THIS CASE.

Tell them to hear your voice.

Recent signatures


    1. Reached 12,500 signatures
    2. With your help we have reached 2000 signatures

      UNJUSTIFIED - the movie
      Petition Organizer

      About ten minutes ago we passed the 2000 mark on our petition urging the Supreme Court to hear the appeal of Sholom Rubashkin. We couldn't have gotten here without you and we want to get even further - so please continue to share the link to the petition and the video with your friends and colleagues.

      On September 24th, less than 5 days from now - the Supreme Court will decide if they are going to hear this appeal. This is his Mr Rubashkin's last chance to be heard - and the last chance for the Court to rule on not only the miscarriage of Justice in his case, but also to address the national issues his appeal raises - those of unchecked prosecutorial conduct, runaway sentencing and the over-criminalization of US citizens within the Justice System.

      With your help we can make a difference.

      The Unjustified Team

      Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57UvOxnuFX
      Sign: http://chn.ge/Rnoqli
      Like us on Facebook: http://on.fb.me/V9yTPD
      Twitter: https://twitter.com/UNJUSTIFIEDUSA

    3. Reached 2,000 signatures


    Reasons for signing

    • Martin Charney VAUGHAN, CANADA
      • about 1 year ago

      I thought it may have (just) been anti Semitism, but it seems that the whole of the US justice system is AGAIN in default and laced with many injustices.

    • Adrian Goldstein LOS ANGELES, CA
      • almost 2 years ago

      I havent read all of the facts of this case, but if this is a case of bank fraud, money laundering and illegal hiring it would seem to me that the sentence is extremely severe if indeed he is guilty of the crimes he is accused of. taking a life might warrant such a sentence but not this.

    • pearl young SKOKIE, IL
      • almost 2 years ago

      Judge was not imparial

    • Daniel Owens TOWSON, MD
      • almost 2 years ago

      Prosecutors are politicians, and politicians should NOT be allow to determine punishment and standards of release.

    • Isaac Teitelbaum MONSEY, NY
      • almost 2 years ago

      I feel this is a clear case of a Judge overreacting with a 27 year prison sentence. This bank fraud case definitely doesn't have the footprint of the criminal attempt that should require the Judge throw the books at Mr. Rubashkin by surpassing the prosecutor's request.


    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.