Stop making drinks that contain pus
  • Petitioned Starbucks

This petition was delivered to:

Starbucks
Chairman & CEO of Starbucks
Howard Schultz

Stop making drinks that contain pus

    1. Petition by

      Action for Animals

Starbucks has recently received widespread attention for starting to use cochineal extract (crushed bugs) as a red food coloring in their strawberry beverages, but that’s not the only objectionable ingredient in their drinks. Their drinks that are made with cow milk (as opposed to a plant-based milk such as soy, rice, or almond) contain pus.

The dairy industry treats cows as if they are machines: female cows are impregnated on a “rape rack,” have their babies taken from them (and usually slaughtered for veal), and their milk that was meant for their babies is taken for people. This cycle repeats until the cows are exhausted by this unnatural intensive process, at which point they are slaughtered. During the milking stages of their lives, the cows are milked several times a day by machines and the cows often develop mastitis, a painful udder infection. As the cows are milked, infected somatic cells (the type of cells that make pus) mix with the milk. 

In 2010, the USDA calculated an average of over 200,000 somatic cells in each milliliter of cow milk. Gross! 

If you saw someone drip pus into your latte or macchiato, would you drink it? Didn’t think so, and you also surely don't want to drink something that is a product of animal cruelty. And that means that you shouldn’t be drinking Starbucks drinks (or anything else) that contain cow milk.

Take action! Tell Starbucks to not only offer vegan plant-based milks (such as soy, almond, rice, and coconut milk) in place of cow milk in all of Starbucks' milk-containing drinks, but to make them readily available and without a price premium, and to clearly mark that they are available on the menu at every location. Finally, to make sure customers know they can get their drinks without cow milk, tell Starbucks to require baristas to ask customers what type of milk they want.

Thank you!

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 250 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Anna Peterson FORT COLLINS, CO
      • over 2 years ago

      I agree. Starbucks should use milk comes from happy female cows and not infected cows.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Anna Peterson FORT COLLINS, CO
      • over 2 years ago

      This is horrible.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Froggy Rex LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
      • over 2 years ago

      I am a meat eating , milk drinking guy ad I don't want any vegan morality shoved down my throat, but i totally condemn the inhumane treatment of animals and animal cruelty. I do my little bit to minimize animal cruelty, starbucks so should you.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Victoria Pitchford TORONTO, CANADA
      • over 2 years ago

      ew..

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Anneka Fane AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
      • over 2 years ago

      Because the more people or companies we can get to stop contributing to the torture, rape, confinement, theft and murder or animals, the better. They don't deserve it. Not to mention dairy milk is terribly unhealthy for humans.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.