Please reverse ASA ruling A13-238570 finding "cyclists should be shown wearing helmets and placed in the most suitable cycling position...[no] more than 0.5 metres from the parking lane"
  • Petitioning Sir Hayden Phillips

This petition will be delivered to:

The Independent Reviewer of ASA Adjudications
Sir Hayden Phillips

Please reverse ASA ruling A13-238570 finding "cyclists should be shown wearing helmets and placed in the most suitable cycling position...[no] more than 0.5 metres from the parking lane"

    1. Mike Stead
    2. Petition by

      Mike Stead

      Whitchurch, United Kingdom

Cycling is a safe activity. Per hour the UK Department For Transport finds it is on par with walking and driving in terms of risk of serious injury or death. Also cycling brings significant health benefits that outweigh any risks by a factor of 20:1.

 

Under this ruling cycling can only be portrayed in UK adverts as requiring safety equipment and positioned in a manner as to expose the cyclist to the risk of car doors being opened on them, or to encourage close/unsafe passing by motor vehicles. This is contra to the Highway Code Rule 67 ("Leave plenty of room when passing parked vehicles and watch out for doors being opened or pedestrians stepping into your path") and Rule 163 ("give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car").

A cycle helmet is not a legal requirement in the UK, nor have they ever been shown by peer-reviewed research to reduce serious or fatal injury rates among cyclists. They have however been shown to dramatically reduce cycling participation, particularly amongst teenagers and women. Portraying cycling in the UK as requiring a helmet or only ever happening whilst helmeted sends the wrong message to the general public, with potentially disastrous long-term consequences from the health and economic impact of reduced cycling participation.

The ASA is factually incorrect in inventing such a contrivance as 'the parking lane' to justify its ruling - there is no right to park a vehicle of any description on the public highway.

Rule 152 of the Highway Code states: "You should drive slowly and carefully on streets where there are likely to be pedestrians, cyclists and parked cars." The ASA has repeatedly refused to ban motor vehicle adverts that clearly breach this rule. This double standard makes a mockery of the ASA's authority to adjudicate on road safety matters.

To:
Sir Hayden Phillips, The Independent Reviewer of ASA Adjudications
Please reverse ASA ruling A13-238570 finding "cyclists should be shown wearing helmets and placed in the most suitable cycling position...[no] more than 0.5 metres from the parking lane"

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 4,000 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Miles Baker Clarke ROYAL TUNBRIDGE WELLS, UNITED KINGDOM
      • about 1 month ago

      I believe the new ruling is counter-intuitive

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • David Pettitt CROWBOROUGH, UNITED KINGDOM
      • about 1 month ago

      Disgust at a quango reinventing the rules of the road

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Sara Pritchard LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
      • about 1 month ago

      This is not portraying or supporting safe ways of cycling on our roads.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Andrew Dalton CHORLEY, UNITED KINGDOM
      • 4 months ago

      The ASA is propagating misleading information regarding safe road positioning. This is dangerous and outside of their purview.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Peter Witting KIBWORTH, UNITED KINGDOM
      • 4 months ago

      It should be a requirement that those appointed to the ASA can show their knowledge of usage of the public highway by cycling 5000 miles or more in a 12 month period.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.