Punish the Judge on the case. Re-trial with new judge.
  • Petitioned kentucky state government

This petition was delivered to:

kentucky state government

Punish the Judge on the case. Re-trial with new judge.

    1. Petition by

      Virginia Murdoch

      Cypress, TX

I believe this article from the Huffington Post can explain it best:

07/21/12 03:56 PM ET
"LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- A 17-year-old Kentucky girl who was upset by the plea deal reached by a pair of teenagers who sexually assaulted her is now facing a contempt charge for tweeting their names in violation of a court order.

The Associated Press does not normally report the names of sexual assault victims, but Dietrich and her parents say they do not want to shield her identity and want her case to be public.

The boys' attorneys have asked a judge to hold Dietrich in contempt for violating the confidentiality of a juvenile hearing and the judge's order not to speak about it.

Dietrich told the paper she was assaulted in August 2011 by two boys she knew when she passed out after drinking at a gathering. She learned months later that pictures of the assault were taken and shared with others.

"For months, I cried myself to sleep. I couldn't go out in public places," she told the newspaper, as her father and attorneys sat nearby. "You just sit there and wonder, who saw (the pictures), who knows?"

Dietrich's attorneys want her contempt hearing open to the media, arguing she has a First Amendment right to speak about her case and to a public hearing.

The boys' attorneys, however, have asked to keep the hearing closed.

The contempt charge carries a possible sentence of 180 days in jail and a $500 fine.

The boys pleaded guilty on June 26 to first-degree sexual abuse and misdemeanor voyeurism. Dietrich says she was unaware of a plea agreement until just before it was announced in court.

She could not say what the proposed punishment was because of the court order, but said she feels like it was a slap on the wrist.

The teens are to be sentenced next month, and the judge could reject or modify the terms of the proposed agreement.

When Judge Dee McDonald admonished everyone at the hearing not to speak about what happened in court or about the crime, Dietrich said she cried.

"They got off very easy ... and they tell me to be quiet, just silencing me at the end," she said.

Afterwards Dietrich tweeted, "They said I can't talk about it or I'll be locked up. ....Protect rapist is more important than getting justice for the victim in Louisville."

David Marburger, an Ohio media law specialist, said Dietrich should have tried to get the courts to vacate the gag order rather than simply violating it.

But Gregg Leslie, interim executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Dietrich should "not be legally barred from talking about what happened to her. That's a wide-ranging restraint on speech."

Leslie said this sort of issue is becoming more common.

"In the past, people would complain to anyone who would listen, but they didn't have a way to publish their comments where there would be a permanent record, like on Facebook and Twitter, for people to see worldwide," he said.

Dietrich said she just needed to stand up for herself. "I'm at the point that if I have to go to jail for my rights, I will do it." "

Savanah Dietrich should not be punished for voicing her frustration about her attackers light punishment.

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 10 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Linda Hoffman MOKENA, IL
      • about 2 years ago

      SHE is the victim, THEY are the criminals!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Chad Herman CLEARWATER, FL
      • over 2 years ago

      Because we should not punish a victim of rape! Period! I commend her for tweeting the names of her attackers. i believe that every rapist should be put on a billboard so that everyone knows who they are, what they've done, and for others to watch out for them. Who knows what will happen then next time a young woman is sleeping around them.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Renee Walker CALGARY, CANADA
      • over 2 years ago

      Would the plea deal and the court order have been the same if it was the Judges daughter??? I absolutely don't think so! Why do these offenders get treated with consideration and the victim does not?!?! Crap court systems like this just gives the go ahead to sex offenders because they get nothing for it! There are harsher laws for stealing, getting caught with pot etc. but rape or child molestation is nothing! Something is wrong with that! And again if it were your kid Judge moron I bet things would be different!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • S. Danielle Hess BALTIMORE, MD
      • over 2 years ago

      If this court has REFUSED to stand up for the victim, as shown by its actions, then this girl is being victimized all over again - and by the very agency that should stand to protect her. Is she expected to sit back and allow herself to be abused again, without protecting herself in any way? That's a great message to send out: "Don't worry about consequences for assaulting anyone, boys. And please feel free to post pornographic images of that assault. We, the court, have taken away your victim's rights to defense and protection." I wonder if Judge Dee McDonald realizes what year he's functioning in. Or, if he does recognize the times, perhaps he's too busy sympathizing with the attackers.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.