Stop threatening President Obama regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline
  • Petitioned Jack Gerard

This petition was delivered to:

CEO, the American Petroleum Institute
Jack Gerard

Stop threatening President Obama regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline

    1. Petition by

      E. Johnston

      Seattle, WA

An Open Letter to API CEO Jack Gerard and the Oil Industry:

Dear Mr. Gerard,

We the undersigned are sending you this letter to express our profound objection to your threat to President Obama, that he needs to approve the Keystone XL pipeline or “face huge political consequences”.

As you are no doubt aware, objections to this ill-considered pipeline have come from all quarters: Republicans, ranchers, Native American and First Nations tribes, environmental groups, farmers, and just about everyone else. This is not a partisan issue.

As you are also no doubt aware, Mike Klink, a former Bechtel engineer who worked as an inspector on the existing Keystone pipeline, lost his job after expressing concerns about shoddy materials and workmanship on that pipeline (which has subsequently suffered 14 spills—12 in its first year). In his words (as reported in Climate Progress): “TransCanada says that the performance has been OK. Fourteen spills is not so bad…That is all bunk. This thing shouldn’t be leaking like a sieve in its first year — what do you think happens decades from now after moving billions of barrels of the most corrosive oil on the planet? Let’s be clear — I am an engineer; I am not telling you we shouldn’t build pipelines. We just should not build this one." He further stated that Keystone XL would be a "disaster". 

To dismiss the concerns of this broad coalition of people and pretend that the handful of jobs the pipeline would temporarily create is the real issue is disingenuous and irresponsible. To pretend that our nation’s energy and national security are dependent upon an ill-conceived and badly built pipeline through America’s breadbasket and above one of our most important aquifers is something beyond disingenuous and irresponsible. The American people, happily, are not naïve enough to believe such craven rhetoric, and we understand pretty precisely the place that oil industry money has in our political process. Explicitly threatening the president, however, takes the implicit thuggery of your billions to a new low.

We know that we can have no energy or national security until we shift our spending and our innovation to clean energy projects.  API and the corporations it represents would have us believe that our farmland, our water, and our biodiversity are of secondary importance to business as usual, and that new pipelines for the dirtiest oil on earth are therefore preferable to conservation and innovation. They are not. It is abundantly evident that America’s energy and national security cannot be secured while the oil industry maintains its death grip on our political process, and your threats make it clear that you are not a trustworthy partner with whom to build a new energy future. It's too bad; with your resources you could have made a real difference in the world.

You may be right, though, about there being great political consequences for the President if he disallows the pipeline; his base might really believe in him again. 

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 250 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Daniel Hazard CORONA, CA
      • over 2 years ago

      I simply cannot trust anythimng that further infringes on sensitive wetlans with oil proven to cause massive damamge from previous disasters and especially not on the heels of the Guld distaster we just witnessed not long ago. It is irresponsoible to allow such an abomination and direct threat to life in thes country. I consider it an act of aggression on our land.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Barbara Tomlinson SEATTLE, WA
      • over 2 years ago

      "The American people, happily, are not naïve enough to believe such craven rhetoric, and we understand pretty precisely the place that oil industry money has in our political process. Explicitly threatening the president, however, takes the implicit thuggery of your billions to a new low."

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • steve smith FRESNO, CA
      • almost 3 years ago

      It isn't just our President you threaten, when we would even stand by George W. Bush against foreigners who would threaten him as President of the United States, but Mr. Gerard, you are threatening the Nation and its citizens and their laws and order.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Eben Goresko CO, AL
      • almost 3 years ago

      I am disgusted by those thugs. They need to be turned around like the Tobacco Industry was by Clintion!

      Bring on High Noon!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Irene Paine BIGFORK, MT
      • almost 3 years ago

      Sure, I drive a car. But really, lets not jeopardize the water aquifer for this water rules, not fuel.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.