Ban religious slaughter in the European Union
  • Petitioning Mrs Erminia Mazzoni

This petition will be delivered to:

Chair of the Committee on Petitions at the European Parliament
Mrs Erminia Mazzoni

Ban religious slaughter in the European Union

    1. Occupy for Animals
    2. Petition by

      Occupy for Animals

      Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Petition started by Occupy for Animals on August, 19, 2012.

For more information concerning this petition please visit: http://www.occupyforanimals.org/ban-religious-slaughter-throughout-europe.html 

Occupy for Animals has requested the European Parliament to register this petition and is awaiting confirmation. By signing this petition, we will be able to notify you as soon as we have received confirmation from the European Parliament. 

ABOUT THIS PETITION:

The ritual slaughter of animals decreed by Jewish and Muslim dietary laws require that the animals are conscious when they have their throats slit. In the European secular food industry, regulations strive to minimise "the risk of causing pain, fear or distress to the animals" in their being slaughtered for food. Crucially, these rules require the stunning of animals before being killed, either with a bolt to the brain, or with electricity. However, the law kowtows before the Jewish kashrut and Islamic halal guidelines in permitting avoidance of stunning.

In 2009, New Zealand veterinarian scientist Craig Johnson was given an award from the Humane Slaughter Association, for his body of work that demonstrates that animals suffer more without stunning. In one crucial experiment, Johnson et al administered mild anaesthetics to calves so that they could not feel the pain of the incision, but the pain response was still measurable. It remained present in the animals without stunning, but was immediately erased by stunning.

"I think our work is the best evidence yet that it's painful", Johnson told New Scientist. While this may appear to come from the oft-referenced University of the Bleeding Obvious, in fact defenders of Jewish shechita and Muslim dhabiha slaughter cite scientific evidence that the practice is not painful to the animal. In 2003, the Muslim Council of Great Britainclaimed that "the brain is instantaneously starved of blood and there is no time to start feeling any pain." Johnson's work says otherwise. [A. Rutherford 2009]

Since then at least two studies have been published in Europe (Lambooij 2008 and DIALREL 2011). 

In the DIALREL report of last year, nine researchers (among them Lambooij) concluded that throat cutting without anaesthetic carried the highest risks of animals suffering: 'Pain, suffering and distress during the cut and during bleeding are highly likely.' Sedation methods are admittedly not without risks for animal wellbeing, but they are considerable smaller, claim the researchers. They cite from about 300 scientific articles and base their views on observations by veterinary researchers in slaughterhouses in Germany, Spain, England, France, Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel and Australia.

The European Union directive, "European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Slaughter", generally requires stunning before slaughter, but allows member states to allow exemptions for religious slaughter: "Each Contracting Party may authorize derogations from the provisions concerning prior stunning in the following cases: – slaughtering in accordance with religious rituals ...".

In May 2009 the European Parliament voted in favour of allowing ritual slaughter in member states.

What is the difference for the animals?

Non-stunned animals are slaughtered in vivid mindfulness, they experience unacceptable suffering. Their agony can last several minutes.

In the context of slaughter with stunning, the animal does not suffer at the time of slaughter, since there is loss of consciousness. Scientists have clearly stated: "Because of the serious animal welfare associated with slaughter without stunning, stunning should always be carried out before the slaughter."

In some countries, ritually killed animals are stunned before bleeding (Norway, Sweden, Austria, Switzerland, New Zealand). The steps are then the same as for conventional slaughter.
 
The video (graphic!) in the following link demonstrates the difference between slaughter with prior stunning, vs slaughter without stunning (ritual or religious slaughter). While the animal in the first method is rendered unconscious immediately, the animals slaughtered without prior stunning experience their agony in full consciousness. You don't need to be an expert to see that this causes immense unnecessary suffering to the animals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvH8rz7QwZM&feature=player_embedded 

If we, as the dominant species on Earth (!), are to use and consume animals, it is our duty to minimize their suffering in doing so. The anachronism of slaughter without stunning has no place in the modern world and should be outlawed. This special indulgence to religious practices should be replaced with the evidence-based approaches to which the rest of us are subject. 

For us, religious freedom stops where human or animal suffering begins.

Our petition requests that the European Parliament prompts the Council to delete from Council Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing the derogation whereby animals can be killed without prior stunning where such methods of slaughter are prescribed by religious rites (Art. 4.4).

By signing this petition, the letter that you can read under the tab 'Petition Letter' will be sent instantly to Mrs Erminia Mazzoni - Chair of the Committee on Petitions at the European Parliament.

Thank you very much in advance for your signature. 

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 25,000 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • De Vignani Luisa ROQUEBRUNE CAP MARTIN, FRANCE
      • about 5 hours ago

      Tha's no religion. That is CRUELTY

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Leslene Dunn CLAREMONT, SOUTH AFRICA
      • about 9 hours ago

      Barbaric uncivilised savages. Dear God, I want to execute the last one standing!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Cheryl Hughes OAK PARK, AUSTRALIA
      • 1 day ago

      This barbaric act must be stopped!!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Lyn Wainwright LIVERPOOL, UNITED KINGDOM
      • 1 day ago

      Why are humans so cruel? We know how much pain we inflict on these animals during slaughter but don't seem to care at all. And as for religious slaughter, causing pain to another living creature in the name of "religion" is complete hypocrisy. I wish all these so called religions would practise what they preach on each other instead of poor animals.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Arif Jamal INDIA
      • 2 days ago

      we have no right to take life of innocent and helpless animals to earn accolades in the eyes of God... If someone really feels like sacrificing something... Dare sacrifice a limb or even a finger or even an ounce of blood from own body... Then you would know the pain...

      Why does an animal has to pay the price with his life and blood to get you accolades from God... It's you who seek God's blessings... So sacrifice should be done by you and not by a helpless and mute animal

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.