×
You seem to have had an issue loading this page or you have javascript disabled, which may cause problems while using Change.org. To avoid any further inconvenience, please enable javascript in your browser and refresh this page.
BAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE ON CIVILIANS
  • Petitioned US Comptroller General

This petition was delivered to:

Government Accountability Office (GAO)
US Comptroller General
Surgeon General
US Surgeon General
World Health Organization
Director-General
Department of Justice
US Attorney General

BAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE ON CIVILIANS

    1. Kommy Yazdian, CPA
    2. Petition by

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA

      Miami, FL

These unconscionable travesties are the ultimate crimes against humanity and we are all at risk. Please address the outcries of all survivors in ending all forms of electronic genocide and menticide.  Also see

BAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE ON CIVILIANS

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy/  as of 8.11.12 with 1,651 Signatures since 8.11.07

Recent signatures

    News

    1. Reached 1,500 signatures
    2. Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - Brain Invaders - Season 3 Episode 7

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      Gov. Jesse Ventura investigates Mind Control Weapons in this episode featuring my friends Lisa Becker & Dr. Robert Duncan, PhD, and several other Targeted Individuals. http://youtu.be/u0gToB6jLJA

    3. The Case of James Walbert

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      Please show your support for Inventor, James Walbert, who has been championing our cause for years at: http://igg.me/p/136174?a=1557280 Thank you.

    4. http://www.targeted-individuals.com

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      "The Targeted Individuals website provides information on the parallel judicial system that targets activists, whistleblowers and members of the public. It also provides insights on the policies and covert methods and techniques of Government and non-government organisations" please visit http://www.targeted-individuals.com to learn more.

    5. Reached 250 signatures
    6. Comptroller General of the US:

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      There are more than 1,800 victims’ signatures on this petition Ban Electronic Warfare on Civilians. Also, there are more than a dozen similar petitions online with many more petitioners’ complaints pleading for an end to this torture, menticide, & silent genocide.

      For decades Targeted Individuals have been obliterated under the watchful eyes of their governments. We are asking you to intervene with investigations to expose & help stop the deployment of these Cruel & Unusual Weapons of Mass Destruction on Civilians and our environment.

      With your help we can put an end to these crimes against humanity & fight corruption, fraud, abuse, & neglect of various governmental agencies who have been entrusted with our safety & security.

      www.Facebook.com/TargetedIndividuals


      PS Please see the links of the petition http://www.change.org/petitions/ban-electronic-warfare-on-civilians& http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy for the petitioners comments & testimonies.

    7. WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      Ban Electronic Warfare on Civilians Short URL: http://wh.gov/1osc

      There are more than 1,800 victims’ signatures on this Petition: Ban Electronic Warfare on Civilians http://www.change.org/petitions/ban-electronic-warfare-on-civilians & http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy . Also, there are more than a dozen similar petitions like it online with many more petitioners’ complaints pleading for an end to this genocide & menticide.

      For decades Targeted Individuals have been killed, injured, tortured, & actively denied their basic Human Rights under the watchful eyes of their governments. We ask you to intervene with an immediate Executive Order to stop the deployment of these Cruel & Unusual Weapons of Mass Destruction on Civilians and our environment.

      These unconscionable travesties are the ultimate crimes against humanity and we are all at risk.

      Created: Jul 31, 2012

    8. Sent Today via Email to DOJ: askdoj@usdoj.gov

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      SOS:

      There are nearly 1,800 victims’ signatures on this Petition: Ban Electronic Warfare on Civilians http://www.change.org/petitions/ban-electronic-warfare-on-civilians
      & http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/synergy . Also, there are a dozen similar petitions like it online with many more petitioners’ complaints pleading for an end to this genocide & menticide.

      For decades Targeted Individuals have been killed, injured, & tortured under the watchful eyes of their governments. We ask you to intervene to stop the deployment of these Cruel & Unusual Weapons of Mass Destruction on Civilians.

    9. SOS - Take Charge

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      Thank you for Taking Action. SOS - we can't afford to play Politics with this Pandemic. Please Take Charge by sending supporting Petitions to your favorite Decision Makers any way you can.

    10. Reached 100 signatures
    11. Presidential Executive Order to Ban Mind Control Warfare

      Kommy Yazdian, CPA
      Petition Organizer

      We are requesting an immediate Presidential Executive Order (EO) to Ban all forms of Electronic Warfare: such as DEWs, EMP, RFID Implants, V2K, PsyOp, HAARP, ChemTrails, & Drones on Civilians. We also request this EO to include a Ban on any form of Stalking which is often used in these predatory attacks.

      Many surviving victims testified before your Bioethics Commission last year. Also, many states now have passed Laws against these diabolical crimes! These unconscionable travesties are the ultimate crimes against humanity and we are all at risk.

      Please address the outcries of all survivors by ending this genocide and menticide. Lets not allow secrecy to enslave civility. With your help we can end this pandemic!

    12. Reached 50 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

    • Anita Kanitz STUTTGART, GERMANY
      • 11 months ago

      My Ex-tenant is a sadistic gangstalker! Gang stalking involves the use of multiple individuals to stalk, harass and taunt a victim, as well as to vandalize personal property. This can take place for many years, particularly since law enforcement and legislation have yet to catch up with the reality of organized stalking by groups.

      Techniques of psychological warfare are used against the target in a methodical and well orchestrated attack that often leaves the target a victim of ridicule among his friends and family because this occurrence is so hard to believe. However, the number of targets are increasing to the point that they can network with one another and find out that the same tactics are used everywhere. These tactics are intended to weaken the target to the point of physical and psychological collapse.

      The reasons why a person is initially targeted can vary. Sometimes the person may be a political activist. Others may have been in the wrong place at the wrong time. Corporations apparently have even been known to hire these stalking groups to silence people who were once in their employ. These stalking gangs may be lied to about the target, thinking that perhaps the person is a deviant who needs to be driven out of town. The reasons are only limited to the imagination. In some cases, according to David Lawson, author of Terrorist Stalking in America, the person has done nothing wrong but is simply used as a practice target or as an example to others in the group to show what can happen to them if they anger the group in some way. This serves to keep the members of these stalking groups tied to the group through intense fear of becoming a target. It is such a terrifying prospect because the gang members are intimately aware that the lives of the targets are utterly destroyed.

      Many people ask, "Why would anyone engage in this kind of activity?". In order to answer that question, it's important to realize that the person who has decided to target an individual is not the person (or persons in this case) doing the stalking. This is known as "stalking by proxy". Those who have called "the hit" (so-to-speak) may be doing it for any number of reasons, including revenge, jealousy, or a desire to keep someone silent. It may be that physically harming a person is considered too extreme or too risky by the perpetrators. In fact, this kind of psychological attack can be a far more effective way to harm someone. It can completely destroy a person's life while leaving little or no evidence to incriminate the perpetrators.

      Additionally, there are the reasons that the stalkers themselves engage in the activity, which have little or nothing to do with why the person may have been targeted in the first place. It is conceivable that the participants in the harassment don't even know why the person has been targeted, nor would most of these individuals have any personal stake in harassing the victim. But certain things are clear - this is an both an addictive behavior as well as a form of entertainment for the stalkers. From the expressions on the faces of some of the perpetrators who come face-to-face with their targets, there is a vicious kind of pleasure that they derive from bullying their victim. Clearly they like the feeling of being "in control".

      Like our society's current obsession with "reality TV", this activity must inevitably gain popularity as the ultimate experience of "reality" entertainment. Such is the nature of the bottomless pit within the stalkers that thirsts, evermore, for greater and greater thrills. To the perpetrators, their targets are merely their prey, in a game that never ends. But make no mistake, whatever the reasoning behind it, this is a vicious and calculated hate crime.

      DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES

      The types of activities which take place are often subtle, and sometimes cannot be distinguished from normal everyday things that go wrong, but they typically occur much more frequently than they would normally. David Lawson points out in his book, Terrorist Stalking in America, that the victim is intentionally "sensitized" to the presence of the stalkers, so he or she will know that the occurences are orchestrated. This causes intense psychological strain due to the isolation and ridicule that results when the target tries to share these experiences with others. It is a psychological reign of terror intended to make a victim look crazy and intended to keep him or her in a constant state of anxiety and stress as to "what will happen next" (also known as "hyper-vigilance").

      There was a 1944 movie called "Gaslight" about a husband trying to drive his wife crazy, from which the term "gaslighting" was derived. According to Slang City, "to gaslight someone is to drive them crazy by intentionally confusing them. It comes from the 1944 movie Gaslight, in which sweet heiress Ingrid Bergman marries creepy Charles Boyer, who hopes to get her inheritance by driving her insane. He convinces her she's seeing and hearing things that don't exist, including the gaslights (what they had before light bulbs) going on and off when he isn't home." The subtle techniques used to make the wife doubt her own sanity are similar to the techniques used by gang stalkers to unnerve a target.

      For example, the perpetrators (who appear to frequently have access to their targets' homes) may sometimes come into the house while the target is out and move things around a little bit, or spread some dirt on the floor or on furniture, or move an item from the house to the car. But usually they won't cause enough damage to involve the Police. This shows that this activity is a psychological game of cat and mouse, and has little to do with any overt kind of damage that may be caused, such as burning someone's house down or stealing valuables.

      In some cases, the target doesn't know s/he is being targeted. It just looks as though the world is full of very rude people, and everything s/he owns breaks constantly ("bad luck"). According to Lawson, the perpetrators don't need the target to know s/he is targeted in order to fill the need within themselves that they are in control.

      Although various researchers have developed different classification systems to describe stalking behaviors, one of the most commonly known classification typology was developed by Sheridan and Boon, who identified four basic types of stalkers.3

      1) Ex-Partner Harassment/Stalking: The ex-partner/harassment stalker comprised half of the stalker types in Sheridan and Boon's research. This type of stalker tends to be motivated by bitterness after an intimate relationship ends. Prior domestic violence and other forms of intimidation are common during the relationship, and when the relationship ends, not only is the stalking victim at risk, but family members, friends, and any new love interests may be at risk as well. These stalkers usually don't spend much time thinking or worrying about their actions because they tend to be impulsive and motivated by anger. Therefore, they aren't necessarily concerned when police are made aware of their actions. The overall risk for violence against persons and property in this stalking typology is high.

      2) Infatuation Harassment: This type of stalker comprised 18.5 percent of Sheridan and Boon's research. These stalkers generally fall into two age ranges: teens and middle-aged individuals. In contrast to the first typology, victims of infatuation harassment stalkers tend to be viewed by their stalkers in a positive light. These stalkers yearn to be with their victims and often view them as objects of ongoing desires and fantasies. As a result, their stalking behaviors generally involve relatively harmless, albeit annoying behaviors. The overall risk for violence in this stalking typology is relatively low.

      3) Delusional Fixation Stalking: Slightly over fifteen percent of the stalkers in the Sheridan and Boon study fell into the delusional fixation typology. These stalkers vary considerably not only in how they view their victims, but also in how much danger they represent to their victims. Stalkers in this typology suffer from a major mental illness that affects their contact with reality. As a result, their behavior and thinking are likely to be disorganized and confused. They often have histories of arrests as well as histories of treatment for mental illness, and their victims commonly have high-profiles (i.e., actors, political figures). This type of stalker often falsely believes they are romatically involved with their victims, although they often have never met. Although their behavior is often disorganized, their potential for violence (including sexual assaults) tends to be high. There also are stalkers in this category whose behavior is more organized. These individuals are likely to misinterpret a chance gesture or benign behaviors on the part of their victims as evidence of their victim's romantic interest in them. Although they are usually less dangerous than the disorganized type, they can become violent if they feel someone is threatening their "relationship" with the victim.

      4) Sadistic Stalking: Approximately thirteen percent of the stalkers in the Sheridan and Boon research were found to be sadistic. Sadistic stalkers see their victims as their prey. Their goal is to intimidate and frighten their victims through obsessive stalking, threatening notes, and/or other types of communication, including the sending of symbolic gifts. These stalkers feel no sense of remorse for their actions, and they are the most dangerous type of stalkers, including the risk for physical and/or sexual assualts upon their victims.

      Although these categories are not exclusive and represent only one of several different stalking models, they can be useful with respect to reducing violence risk by matching the typology with the most effective interventions for each category. For instance, ex-partner stalkers are likely to respond best to interventions designed to put some distance between the victim and the stalker. As a result, joint therapy is not recommended. Infatuation stalkers may be more responsive to therapy designed to address their thinking/infatuation; and in some cases, the issuance of a restraining order may be helpful in reducing stalking behaviors. Delusional stalkers are mentally ill and therefore often require psychiatric assessment and the administration of psychotropic medication to attempt to alter their delusions. Finally, sadistic stalking cases are the most difficult to address because sadistic stalkers tend to not care about legal restrictions, such as restraining orders. In fact, even after their arrest, they may persist in their attempts to intimidate and frighten their victims by contacting them from jail unless strict monitoring of their phone calls and/or mail is enacted. In some cases, a victim's relocation may be the only way to end the sadistic stalking.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • rev. marie stevens BELLEVUE, NE
      • 11 months ago

      because after 10 yrs of it its time for restoration and restoration

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Tanya Thomas MIAMI, FL
      • about 1 year ago

      I am a victim of non consensual experimentation and directed energy weapons testing. I believe that my targeting is racially motivated. I attended the Boston University and encountered racism in the music department. The administrator was fired and after that my targeted began in 2008. I live in Miami and I believe that law enforcement is involved in my targeting and electronic harassment. I plan to seek the assistance of an attorney to prove my case

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Millicent Black ENGLEWOOD, OH
      • over 1 year ago

      I have been victimized by this electronic warfare I can prove all the way back to 1990. I have entries in my journal as of Jan. 1990 that identifies the perpetrator of these crimes against me as having begun to use this technology on me for "practice" while learning the technology. My life, health, family, and finances have been severely effected by this invasion of my privacy and the deliberate attempts to destroy my relationships as well as my life. These weapons shoul be banned and those trained to use them that are now "retired" or "discharged" from the military should be made to sign documents to NOT use them on civilians OR train others to use them. The phrase "Electronic Slavery" was spoken to me by a then enlisted person who has been trained in the technology. These weapons can be used to coerce cooperation in ways that girls and women would never consent to. Who takes responsibility for training men to abuse women?

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Jonathan Gillis BALTIMORE, MD
      • over 1 year ago

      Everywhere a targeted individual goes, their many harassers and the many forms of their harassment, to put it mildly, precede them. We are followed, monitored, and manipulated 24/7. Gang Stalking (GS) is merely one tactic, if you will, employed by the system of mind warfare which enjoys the full might of the hegemonic powers of the New World Order. GS is experienced by the Targeted Individual as a psychological attack, capable of immobilizing and destroying them over time. The covert, and fewer overt, methods used to harass, persecute, and falsely defame the targets, including remote attack via electronic weaponry, leave virtually no evidence to incriminate the civilian spy’s or the weapons deployed and used. The system itself enjoins perfect plausible deniability, with the denial of its very own existence. The Targeted Individual is merely written off, and clinically diagnosed if deemed necessary, often times remotely, without ever seeing a psychiatrist or other mental health “professional”, as mentally ill. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is updated with each new addition to include the aftereffects experienced by Targeted Individuals, so as to ensure their continued virtual imprisonment, and further disavowing them of any formal redress of grievance. In fact, many Targeted Individuals experience such high degrees of trauma for such extending periods of time that they eventually indeed do suffer from so called mental illness. PTSD is but one example of the predictable effects of a victim of extreme trauma. Gang Stalking is essentially workplace mobbing on steroids; organized groups of community members, many of which are ex-conflicts, have coped a plea and agreed to snitch-status, or are criminals engaging in criminal activity while stalking and monitoring the targets 24/7. In many instances, years pass before the Targeted Individual even becomes aware of the sinister reality of his corrupted and terrorized experience. The entire system essential amounts to an organized protocol of terror and terrorism, under the cover of course of preventing and securitizing against the same. Covert psychological torture is not the hallmark of a free, open, sane culture; it is the mark of a psychopathic, totalitarian system of loathing supremacy.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.