Leaving aside the patronizing and stigma-inducing "soft costs" of a soda ban, there's very little proof that measures like this would save a dime in taxpayer health costs. The implementation and enforcement of a "healthy" food stamps regime would offset any hypothesized health care savings, at least in the short term.
And considering the clout of the food industry in the creation of gov't standards, even voluntary ones (see the recent flap over a new food pyramid), you can bet that any rules conceived by healthy food advocates wouldn't survive the rule-making process in the first place.
Shouldn't it be part of this conversation that the enhancements in the bill are funded with cuts to the SNAP (food stamps) program?
I would argue that the bill is not a step in a "decidedly healthier" direction -- it essentially brings marginal gains to kids' lunches by chipping away at their dinner.
Congress CAN do better. Tell them to pass a child nutrition bill WITHOUT cutting food stamps.
Thanks for the quote, Greg! Folks can still sign a petition regarding these cuts until the end of today:
http://www.change.org/petitions/view/stop_cuts_to_snap_food_stamps
There is a petition on this issue open until the end of today. Sign now!
http://www.change.org/petitions/view/stop_cuts_to_snap_food_stamps
The House can still stop the food stamps cut! Call your Rep at (202)224-3121 today, or sign this petition:
http://www.change.org/petitions/view/stop_cuts_to_snap_food_stamps
You can sign a petition to stop this!
http://www.change.org/petitions/view/stop_cuts_to_snap_food_stamps
|
5 Actions
2 Recruits
|
2 Actions
2 Recruits
|
|
1 Action
|
1 Action
1 Recruit
|