Login to Change.org
Create an Account
dave thomas
I am here to wallow in the mire of individuals that would throw away the gift of liberty to use the force of government to further their own selfish opinions.
charities and causes are great when motivated by one's own heart and hard work. when one seeks to use force, and ultimately government is force, they are no better than any other dictator.
Recent Activity
-
dave commented on the article |whoops,
if WE all worked together to ensure WE could all do our own thing......
-
dave commented on the article |
agreed. if you all worked together to ensure we could all do our own thing, i think we'd find we would all suddenly have something in common. who knows, we might even like each other.
-
dave commented on the article |Government created the problem.
Now government proposes to steal from those that were responsible to pay for those that were not.
How is this the party of Jefferson?
-
dave commented on the article |how is a country with a negative savings rate and a central bank "capitalist"?
i hope we can make auto repairs a human right too. i am also tired of paying for those services.
-
dave commented on the article |
year ending aug. 31, 2009, medicare= 88 TRILLION dollars in unfunded liabilities. why on earth would we let the government control health care? LAST TIME they fixed it so "quality, affordable care for all" would be available, we got the hmo act and the system we currently enjoy. how many times will these parasites fail before we stop relying on pontificating non-producers for results? if the idiots in washington were ACTUALLY competent, they would have a real job, instead of leeching off my productivity. get my jail cell ready, i refuse to participate and i refuse to part with one more nickle.
-
dave commented on the article |but how could i, an average citizen, manage my own life without the input of my rulers? i need them to take care of my health, my security, my retirement, heck, everything. that way i can focus solely on producing tax revenue. thank gosh our Constitution is a "living document" and the only known legal contract that allows one half of the parties involved to reinterpret the language contained within to their liking.
-
dave commented on the article |what in the H$LL are you guys babbling about? where have i stated that i am against gay marriage? what i did say was that the government has no business regulating marriage. i also said that NO MATTER WHAT MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE MIGHT BE, individual liberty trumps my "lifestyle" choices. mr. mchugh referred to the privileges that come with secular marriage, which is why i inquired about the tax advantages. mr. mc hugh, thank you for the bold declaration of your sexual orientation. in case you missed it again, i don't care which way you swing, it's NONE OF MY BUSINESS. I AM ONLY AS FREE AS YOU ARE. individual liberty is my goal. hence my annoying reference to the constitution. for goodness sakes, show me where i lost you.
-
dave commented on the article |
Mr. McHugh,
What would the benfits of secular marriage be if we were not taxed on our labor, as was intended by our Constitution? I am not trying to "make marriage my own" by claiming anything. I am trying to say that two consenting adults do not need the blessings of government to enter into a mutually beneficial contract. Is your goal only to reap financial gain? I am not sure what you think marriage is. So sorry that my nonPC use of the word "lifestyle" offended you so, try being a little tolerant of those outside your group. Good luck getting that Catholic church wedding legislated in your favor.
-
dave commented on the article |
perhaps reading comprehension is not one of your strengths. i merely stated that nowhere in the constitution is the regulation of marriage one of the governments enumerated powers. my suggestion was to stop asking the government permission for a privilege that is not theirs to grant. freedom is an issue that even those opposed to your lifestyle should be able to rally around. re-frame the argument from one of "gay rights" into freedom for all. that was my point. whatever my personal feelings regarding gay marriage might be are of no consequence when individual liberty is the battle. support your constitution, support freedom.
-
dave commented on the article |treaty of copenhagen? no thanks, i support the sovereignty of our country. we don't need an unelected body of government taxing us to combat deforestation.
Impact
0 Actions
0 Recruits