I am not signing because I believe Davis to be innocent; I am asking you to consider the possibility that enough evidence exists to at least raise a reasonable doubt as to his guilt. We are talking about a human life; it shouldn't be taken because people are unable - or unwilling - to acknowledge a possible mistake.
In his comments of 1/2/10, Mr. Wright alleges a less-than-thorough approach to our research for The Slave Next Door; we could not disagree more. It is important to note that Mr. Wright was a defense attorney in the case, rendering him a less-than-impartial source. He admittedly has not read the book, nor does he possess the expertise to make a judgment on its overall validity or veracity. Mr. Wright is incorrect in his assumption that insufficient research was done on this case, or for that matter, on the book in general, or that we would distort our information "to sell copy." Everything in our book was researched and annotated, and in this particular case, we used information from a number of sources beyond the media, including the Department of Justice, FBI and Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Bork, whose position was definitive. If, in fact, the charges were ultimately dismissed, we will make the appropriate changes in the upcoming paperback edition. However, we would ask Mr. Wright to provide the appropriate documentation to corroborate his assertion. We would also suggest that he actually read the book before making further comments regarding its viability.
Wow. I'm really touched. Many thanks for your comments, and for sharing your site with us.Ron
|
2 Actions
|
2 Actions
|