Login to Change.org
Use Facebook to connect with friends and mobilize your social network.
Create an Account
Robert Smith
Recent Activity
-
Robert commented on the article |Isaac, if you expect people here to actually read your comment, that is one thing. To expect them to comprehend it is another, but you actually expect an intelligent response. That's ridiculous!
-
Robert commented on the article |
I wasn't talking about religion. I take exception to the whole sale thief of private property because you disagree with them on this or that. If that's where we start, where does it stop? Laws are enacted to protect all of us, you really want to give those kinds of powers to anyone. Aside from your self, who would be wise enough to wield that power?
Stalin isn't one of my hero's I'm afraid.
And just by the way, compared to how my father was treated by his lunatic fanatical father you had a picnic. He was beaten unconscious with a chain, a hell of a lot more often than just Sundays. The fact that he even survived is a miracle. That didn't mean the church that spoke against such things was bad, but rather the idiot that was listening didn't get the message.
-
Robert commented on the article |
If comments like this are anything to go by Ken then your right, your not real smart. Stop and think for a moment of the ramifications of your suggestion, or do you like the idea of living in communist Russia in the fifties?
-
Robert commented on the article |If I were OK with that then I wouldn't have said enough is enough. It was she who wanted to keep trying. After I almost lost her twice I pulled the pin, not her. She loves children and is a far better woman than any other I've ever met. In fact I believe she is the finest human being I've ever known by a long way, and I'm not alone in that assessment.
Do I believe that women are murderers? I have never said that. I have never suggested that. The health in danger crap is a croc. Health in danger is anything from it will mess up my calendar to an ectopic pregnancy. Some are valid most are not.
I believe Scott Roeder was grossly wrong in what he did. I do believe I have made that profoundly clear a number of times else where.
As for criticizing etc, I have disagreed with you and others but here's the rub Barb, I'm allowed to disagree. It seems that I explain my position a little to well. What's the matter, too close to the bone? This is a forum of rigorous and hopefully intelligent and logical debate. I wasn't aware I had to cave in to every half witted postulation just because they would like to be right. I don't suffer fools who insult my intelligence such as the idiot below. Read the posts where this drip entered and see if you can make any sense of the dribble that she wastes our time with. If you can tolerate that than good for you, personally I have little time for morons.
Finally, I really couldn't give a toss what you think of me, I wasn't born so I could satisfy you or anyone else, and I'm not so insecure that I even bother trying. Think what you like, it's still a free country!
-
Robert commented on the article |
Mohammed butchered whole communities, a number of them for no other reason than they disagreed with him. Only an ignorant twit would compare the two.
Unfortunately you are a demonstrated idiot. If I have to agree with an idiot in order to be accepted I'll give it away. You'll forgive me if I don't waste another dot on you. Here's your big chance to sound intelligent while having an argument with yourself.
-
Robert commented on the article |
Mohammed butchered whole communities, a number of them for no other reason than they disagreed with him. Only an ignorant twit would compare the two.
Unfortunately you are a demonstrated idiot. If I have to agree with an idiot in order to be accepted I'll give it away. You'll forgive me if I don't waste another dot on you. Here's your big chance to sound intelligent while having an argument with yourself.
-
Robert commented on the article |
The logic is sound, perhaps you should re visit your own posts. You want it both ways. You want moral absolutes where it suits you but your own beliefs where it does not, or where flies in the face of your delicacies.
You don't make a drop of "logical" sense to me either. I listen to other points of view all the time when they don't want to play both sides of the street at the same time. Structured logical arguement will always have my attention. To this end I asked my daughter of 22 years to read the posts to see if I were missing something. She seems to think the point is valid. I have an associate that I don't know very well who I asked about an hour ago to read the posts to see if I was off base, he too seemed to think the point is valid. He is really interesting because he disagrees with me on just about everything, because he is 'gay', but even he could see the logic.
Nah, I've never considered myself an oracle, but I know logic when I see it, and frankly I ain't seen that much from here.
By the way, there are many 30+ week abortions, but I should still be outraged if there were but 1. With a child fully formed at 8 weeks, that's right, full central nervous system, can still feel everything that we can. Have you guts enough to hear how they do it? I'd be happy to explain every gory detail of that which you are defending if you wish?
Your pathetic argument is so gross how could anyone with any grasp even consider it logic?
-
Robert commented on the article |
Even if the theory were true, that is a long way from genetic science often claimed. Throw childhood sexual abuse and the interruption of a child's sexual hibernation into the mix and it's a nightmare.
But, I don't see the spreading of the problem to other innocent children as any solution, quite the contrary. While we're in schools with young children who have no interest at all in sex, sending them what must be confusing messages, we are by definition interrupting their sexual hibernation. The results are all around us, and it's not just the 'gay' material, it's all of it. When they get near puberty would be much more appropriate.
-
Robert commented on the article |
Andrea Amel, no I don't realize homosexuality is not a choice. Born that way? Bull shit. Maybe made that way. Matter of genetics? Bull shit. You haven't got one stitch of "scientific" evidence to support that. Wishful thinking perhaps. I think that covers it. I'll sort the family situation should it arise.
-
Robert commented on the article |
That slim ball thought he was doing the right thing weather you agree with him or not. It is a valid position using your logic. The trouble with it is that you don't agree, but it is sound logic using your own logic.
If a baby were 'ripped' apart at thirty weeks, one could imagine the screams of agony. Good job we can't hear the screams if they are in the womb. Just because we can't hear them, doesn't follow they don't happen. I IS murder, and women don't have a right to that choice.
I have read your posts and it's still murder of the most cowardly kind.
Impact
0 Actions
0 Recruits
