Recent Activity

  • Axelrod Backs Away from Committing to Immigration Reform in 2010
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    If there is a God and if you are "good" people, then why does he not solve your problem? Maybe you are not good people and he wants to punish you? Or maybe he doesn't exist?


    The simple fact is that people who are ignorant of the law or who break the law are going to get into trouble.


    Some of them will then blame other people or the govt for their trouble.


    Is this news to anyone?


     

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    Let's also remember Bosnia, Irag, Afghanistan - countries peopled almost entirely by whites, i.e. Caucasians.

  • Axelrod Backs Away from Committing to Immigration Reform in 2010
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    God did not provide Americans will civil liberties anymore than God denies civil liberties to those in many other countries.


    No one is saying reform is not needed. It is the nature of reform that is under discussion. Most persons fully aware of all the facts and consequences relating to massive immigration (and without a financial interest in exploiting cheap labor) agree that the best reform would involve:


    1. 80-90% reduction in legal immigration quotas


    2. 100% reduction in illegal immigration


    3. Amnesty for illegal aliens with extreme hardship situations (maybe 1 % of illegal aliens).


    4. Much stronger enforcement of immigration laws.


    The very last thing we want immigration reform to do is to provide further rewards and incentives to illegal immigration.


    One can sympathize with your situation, but you and your wife created that situation. Don't blame the government for not being a candy store.

  • Anti-Immigration Forces Dwindling
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    Henry,


    Ignorance, personal attacks, hate and unwarranted assumptions are a poor substitute for facts and reason.


    "My party"? I've always been a liberal (very different from "hard left") and a political independent.


    Knowledge of Latin America? I've lived, worked and lectured in many parts of Latin America, from Patagonia to Baja California, since the early 1970s. I know more about it, its history and people and have more friends there than you will ever know or have.


    I want "to continue the white supremacist legacy..."? Guess I sure made a big mistake marrying a woman of another race.


    The ignorance, hate and prejudice in your words gives you no credibility in public fora such as this one. And that's a good thing.

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    The only Mexicans I referred to as "illegals" are those who are, in he government's official terminology, "illegal aliens."

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    The only Mexicans I referred to as "illegals" are those who are, in he government's official terminology, "illegal aliens."

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    The "poisoning of the entire planet" has long been a "group exercise." Right now China is the leader.


    The folks who run the government of Mexico, and the governments of many other Latin American countries, also have "white asses," i.e. they are completely or primarily of European ancestry.


    Do all of them have to leave, too?


    How about the "black asses"? African-Americans object to illegal aliens even more than most whites do. Are they supposed to go back to Africa? Do you know about the Latino gangs in Los Angeles that are trying to "ethnically cleanse" African-Americans out of some neighborhoods by physical intimidation.


    Seems to me, Clifford, you've got too much anger in you and a very distorted view of reality.

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    Spanish has never been the dominant language of the Southwest.


    We went straight from dominance by a collection of Native American languages to dominance by English.


    Only in a tiny number of cities and towns did Spanish ever dominate.


    The Mexican illegals and their ancestors come almost entirely from souithern Mexico; the Southwest was never "their land" or that of their ancestors.


     


     

  • "Deport Us Now"
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    "A Country is a group of people that submit to a particular set of Ideas,or governing laws. The US was founded at the signing of the Declaration of Independence. It was validated by the winning of the Revolutionary war. They happened to be on the North American Continent and the Native Americans got screwed, but that oath to that Declaration, or an oath to abide by a set of laws is when Countries are formed. The Native Americans were a people or Nation with or without land They didn't cease to be a people or Nation when they lost their land."


    They "got screwed." Succinct and accurate.


    The Native Americans were a noble people.But they were a multicultural society (speaking hundreds of different languages), had a weak military and an open border immigration policy.


    That was a lethal combination for a nation 500 years ago and it is one for any nation today. You reap what you sow.


     


     


     


     

  • Korean-American Student Shares More Than Secrets
    Stuart commented on the article | about 2 years ago

    Not completely correct, Kurt.


    A major function of the immigration system is to LIMIT THE NUMBER of immigrants.


    We can only take in a miniscule fraction of "those who wish to better themselves."

More Activity
0 Recruits