I'm angry. I can't help it. I can't help but think: if an openly and outspoken anti-semite, racist or otherwise bigoted preacher had been selected...which of the above appeasement points would be considered acceptable? Is inclusion really a viable excuse? Or the fact that the other preacher isn't a hate-monger?
Then again, I recognize that "uninviting" him at this point would be a political mess. So, in the end, I think Obama owes us one. A big one. Including in his inaugural speech the need for recognizing LGBT rights (and not just in a passing phrase) might be a good start.
Let's face it: the more he talks about us being "equals" the closer to equality we become. Giving Warren this pulpit is a major setback, but Obama has the ability to make up for it by his words and actions.
|
3 Actions
|