In my opinion, if a private company like eHarmony wants to do that, I cannot deny that it is their right to do so, and they will reap what they sow in profits due to how many more or less they could have had from their separate but equal solution.
Personally, I am disappointed that the original website of eHarmony.com will not be modified to include LGBT folks. It's a "separate but equal" solution to create this adjunct website. And while it will, (most likely due to the lawsuit), offer the same services as it does for heterosexual folks on eHarmony, it is discomfitting in a strong way.
Creating a "separate but equal" website is most certainly not in congruance with the statement of Niel Clark Warren's original thoughts that he never believed he was discriminating against gays and lesbians. Because by creating a website that is "separate but equal", he most certainly is.
If the government wants to deter violent crime, focus on ways to improve social organization, not make it worse by putting a father or a mother away for having a little weed, leaving the kids with a broken home. That's how you start crime, not deter it. If it's really the drugs that our leaders want to make their mission to combat, then prioritize and start by focusing on drugs that don't come directly from the ground.