• 14 Votes
    Vote Now!
    "END CORPORATE PERSONHOOD"

    Good ideas are a dime a dozen, we need implementation of good ideas.  Politics in the United States effectively stop campaigns for good ideas.

    You see, we do not have a lack of good ideas at all.  It is fine and worthy to have a discussion or even competition about good ideas.  Yet, what we sorely lack are democratic ways to take a god idea and make it happen.  The impediments of power and control stand firmly in the way of change.org/ideas.

    Corporations are not people.  Our Bill of Rights is for people not corporations. To END CORPORATE PERSONHOOD we need nothing short of a Constitutional Amendment to legally define corporations as different from people.  This will restore integrity to our Bill of Rights and will effectively take down the political barricade that stops good ideas right in their tracks.

     

     

Comments

  1. Leah Sullivan

    This is the single most important thing we can do to pull our country out of the teeth of the multinational corporate monster that is poised to exploit and consume us.

    Posted by Leah Sullivan on 01/25/2010 @ 10:00PM PT

  2. Luis O

    Wes,

    A major national campaign to do this is underway. See http://ReclaimDemocracy.org and http://MoveToAmend.org

    Posted by Luis O on 01/26/2010 @ 09:11AM PT

  3. Jan  Marcus

    I think the key to ending corporation "personhood" is knowing the difference between corporations and persons.  Corporations cannot be one person, but is an AGGREGATE (more than one) person. The corporation is something which has attained immortality, something which is denied to all free individuals (i.e., mortal Beings).   So when the courts say that corporations are persons and that they are given the same rights as other persons, get clarification.  Are they saying that corproations have the same rights as other aggregate persons or other mortal Being persons?  The aggregate person's rights cannot be compared to the mortal Being's rights-- they simply cannot be the same rights.

     

    Posted by Jan Marcus on 01/27/2010 @ 01:32PM PT

  4. Morris Kahn

    If an individual can only contribute $2,000 (or whatever the maximum donation permitted is), and a corporation is allowed the protections of the individual, why isn't the corporations' contribution limit capped at the same annual donation limit?

    Posted by Morris Kahn on 02/04/2010 @ 09:24AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Ideas for Change in America is a national competition to select the best ideas from across the country and turn them into reality.

Submit an Idea View all Ideas »

Promote an Idea

This idea is currently in 26th Place in Government Reform and Transparency and needs 415 more votes to make it into the final round What's this?

Support this idea? Here's how you can help:

1.     Share it on social networking sites
Post to Facebook Tweet This

2.     Email friends »

3.     Post a Widget on Your Webpage   (Get Widget)

Top Ideas about Government Reform and Transparency

The top 3 rated ideas from each issue category will make it into the final round. Read More »

Delete Idea

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action. If you already have an account click here.

  Cancel