Will Govt Ever Change is Policy of Vaccination Lies and Cover-ups?
Published July 27, 2009 @ 09:18AM PT
Demand your Right to Self-Shield instead of submitting to the jab:
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2752
Last month the Secretary of "Health and Human Services" Kathleen Sebelius issued a declaration under the bioterrorism laws to provide "liability protections for pandemic countermeasures" including vaccines... well, OK, so what's new? Vaccine pushers have been exempt from liability since the early '80s.
That's when Congress [except for a certain Good Doctor there] ever supine to the drug company's needs, took away our right to sue for vaccine induced injuries. Instead the govt set up the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which has paid out over $2 billion for death and injury of thousands of children. Where does that money come from? Not from the drug companies' bloated, monopoly coffers, but rather from a special tax paid by each person forced to buy vaccines - a tax to protect drug company profits from selling poison.
The "declaration" it turns out bears rather closer scrutiny for what it also says, and doesn't say, about the vaccines themselves.
You can read the Secretary's bureaucratize at:
http://frwebgate4.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=622806444691+35+1+0
But what is said about the vaccines that are now to be given without liability for the harm they will do is both brief and instructive. The Secretary says: "Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the threat of 2009 H1N1 influenza..."
Note the rhetoric; it uses the rubric "MAY" be effective... instead of the standard drug law statement that vaccines "are safe and effective." My colleague, Jim Turner Esq. of Swankin and Turner (www.swankin-turner.com) remarked to me, as we discussed this with Dr. Rima E. Laibow (www.HealthFreedomUSA.org), "To be adjudged "safe and effective" a drug (including vaccine) must have benefits that outweigh the risks..."
So, Madame Secretary, are you telling us, by your very loud silence, that you don't know if the no-liability, uninsurable vaccine is safe? You are certainly telling us you don't know for sure that it is "effective!" President Obama: PLEASE read the RFK Jr article linked below and do what you've promised: let the truth out! Protect our children!
What is going on here with the Pandemic (Weaponized) Vaccine Panic? What is the govt's real agenda?
The last "swine flu" vaccine killed hundreds and no pandemic developed. Maybe people, in general, refusing the killer vaccine in '76 is the reason that flu never became pandemic.
The advanced healthcare theory is the vaccine itself "chooses" which strain of seasonal flu becomes epidemic and it was another experimental pandemic vaccine in 1918 that tiggered that pandemic disaster. Enough people who receive the vaccine always shed a concoction of viral particles that cause the spread of disease.
Rather than vaccines helping the situation, those who receive the vaccine become a present danger to public health! Certainly a threat to the unvaccinated majority.
Saying "NO!" to voluntary or mandated vaccination, it seems, is good for your health, and that of the community.
And holding vaccine makers and pushers liable for the foreseeable harm they cause is the opposite of what our misguided govt is doing...
Ralph Fucetola JD
PS - Think the govt doesn't lie when its alleged "scientists" do a risk/benefit analysis? You need to read this extraordinary article on the mercury vaccine danger cover-up by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Here is a teaser: ""My gut feeling?" [the govt doctor] said. "Forgive this personal comment - I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on." But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data..."
http://www.infowars.com/vaccinations-deadly-immunity/
PS#2 - Remember to demand your Right to Self-Shield instead of submitting to the jab:
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
