110th Confirms First Federal Judges
Published February 05, 2007 @ 10:18AM PT
This week the 110th Senate unanimously confirmed five nominees to seats on the federal district courts. New Senate Judiciary Chair Patrick Leahy issued a statement in which he pointed out how quickly the new Senate was moving on judicial nominations. He also commended President Bush for not resubmitting the nominations of several controversial nominees, while urging the president to renominate three other district court nominees who have been held up by Senator Sam Brownback’s (R-KS) ridiculous unease about Janet Neff:
"I do not know why the President has not chosen to renominate Judge Neff or the other two Western District nominees. But the approach to nominations we saw in the last Congress, of using nominations to score political points rather than filling vacancies and administering justice, has led to a dire situation in the Western District of Michigan. Judge Robert Holmes Bell, Chief Judge of the Western District, wrote to me and to others about the situation in that district, where several judges on senior status—one over 90 years old—continue to carry heavy caseloads to ensure that justice is administered in that district. Judge Bell is the only active judge. If not for Republican objections, these nominations would be filled by now. "
Senator Leahy went on to urge the president to promptly fill these and other vacancies with “consensus” nominees. In the past the president has claimed the Democrats' reluctance to confirm his far-right nominees was causing a vacancy crisis. Not that there was ever anything to that accusation, but now it's beyond a doubt that members of the president's own party are the ones jeopardizing the swift administration of justice in Michigan.
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Recent Blog Posts
-
- How Nonprofits can work with the Obama Administration
-
Published May 29, 2009 @ 09:14AM PT
Speaker Series - Washington, DC (April 30, 2009) April 30th marked the end of President Obama's first 100 days in office. As the Obama Administration and Congress continue to work on an ambitious domestic agenda, many nonprofits and foundations want a seat at the policy table to ensure their constituents' voices are heard during this critical time... Read More
-
- Justice the Video
-
Published May 27, 2009 @ 07:54AM PT
The Coalition for Constitutional Values, a national coalition of the nation's leading nonprofit and advocacy organizations, announced today that it will begin airing "Justice" a new 30-second television spot that will run on national network news and cable news starting today. The Coalition for Constitutional Values, whose members represent millions of Am... Read More
-
- Sonia Sotomayor
-
Published May 26, 2009 @ 07:48AM PT
President Obama has picked Sonia Sotomayor as his Supreme Court nominee. We are thrilled with this choice. Sonia Sotomayor will be a strong voice to uphold the Constitution and the law to provide equal justice and protect personal freedoms for everyone in America, regardless of wealth, status, or popularity. President Obama has nominated a highly qualifi... Read More
-
- May 501(c)(3) public charities influence the confirmation of Supreme Court nominees?
-
Published May 15, 2009 @ 08:53AM PT
Question: May 501(c)(3) public charities influence the confirmation of Supreme Court nominees? Answer: Yes! The Internal Revenue Service has recognized that influencing the confirmation of federal judges is exactly like influencing any other legislative vote through lobbying. "Because the Senate's action of advice and consent on a judicial nomination is ... Read More
